Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852663›Full record

ReviewClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2017

ESRD Databases, Public Policy, and Quality of Care: Translational Medicine and Nephrology.

William M McClellan, Laura C Plantinga, Adam S Wilk, Rachel E Patzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William M McClellanDepartments of Epidemiology and.
Laura C PlantingaDepartments of Epidemiology and.
Adam S WilkHealth Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health.
Rachel E PatzerDepartments of Epidemiology and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to improve care of patients with ESRD and the policies that guide those activities depend on evidence-based best practices derived from clinical trials and carefully conducted observational studies. Our review describes this process in the context of the translational research model (bench to bedside to populations), with a particular emphasis on bedside care. We illustrate some of its accomplishments and describe the limitations of the data and evidence supporting policy and practice.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMedicareNephrologyQuality of Health CareData AccuracyDatabases as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKidney Failure, ChronicObservational Studies as TopicPolicy MakingPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited StatesChronicEpidemiology and outcomesguidelinesHumansKidney FailureMedical ResearchnephrologypolicyPublic PolicyQuality improvementRenal InsufficiencysurveillanceTranslationalTranslational epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID27852663
PMCPMC5220648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.