Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852615›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2017

Executive functions and the ω-6-to-ω-3 fatty acid ratio: a cross-sectional study.

Kelly W Sheppard, Carol L Cheatham

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02199808 (Fatty Acids and Executive Functions), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02199808 completednot on this map

Fatty Acids and Executive Functions: Cortical Activation and Behavioral Performance.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2014 to 2016Enrolled79ConditionsExecutive Function
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly W SheppardDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Carol L CheathamDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; carol_cheatham@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8841-0105
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Human Development: Interdisiplinary Research TrainingT32HD007376 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BELGER, AYSENIL, PROPPER, CATHI BARBRA · 1988 to 2020
$8.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007376NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ω-6 (n-6) to ω-3 (n-3) fatty acid (FA) ratio (n-6:n-3 ratio) was previously shown to be a predictor of executive function performance in children aged 7-9 y.

objectiveWe aimed to replicate and extend previous findings by exploring the role of the n-6:n-3 ratio in executive function performance. We hypothesized that there would be an interaction between n-3 and the n-6:n-3 ratio, with children with low n-3 performing best with a low ratio, and those with high n-3 performing best with a high ratio.

designChildren were recruited on the basis of their consumption of n-6 and n-3 FAs. The executive function performance of 78 children aged 7-12 y was tested with the use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery and a planning task. Participants provided blood for plasma FA quantification, and the caregiver completed demographic and activity questionnaires. We investigated the role of the n-6:n-3 ratio in the entire sample and separately in children aged 7-9 y (n = 41) and 10-12 y (n = 37).

resultsDietary and plasma n-6:n-3 ratio and n-3 predicted performance on working memory and planning tasks in children 7-12 y old. The interaction between dietary n-6:n-3 ratio and n-3 predicted the number of moves required to solve the most difficult planning problems in children aged 7-9 y and those aged 10-12 y, similar to results from the previous study. There was also an interaction between the plasma n-6:n-3 ratio and n-3 predicting time spent thinking through the difficult 5-move planning problems. The n-6:n-3 ratio and n-3 predicted executive function performance differently in children aged 7-9 y and in those aged 10-12 y, indicating different optimal FA balances across development.

conclusionsThe n-6:n-3 ratio is an important consideration in the role of FAs in cognitive function, and the optimal balance of n-6 and n-3 FAs depends on the cognitive function and developmental period studied. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02199808.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorAge FactorsChildChild DevelopmentCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesExecutive FunctionFatty Acids, Omega-3Fatty Acids, Omega-6FemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsThinkingFatty Acids, Omega-3Fatty Acids, Omega-6CANTABElectric Maze Taskexecutive functionsfatty acidsmiddle childhood

Identifiers

PMID27852615
PMCPMC5183732
OpenAlexW2554662202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.