Observational studyImplementation science : IS2016
A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle.
Observational study in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylene blue versus hydroxocobalamin for septic shock: a real-world comparative effectiveness study using TriNetX.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Prioritized barriers to implementation of personalized immunotherapy for sepsis patients.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Community engagement and implementation science: a hermeneutic review for implementation scientists.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Implementation research in Primary Care (Part 2): How to conduct implementation research?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026Review
- Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in acute hospitals. Recording patient-reported wellness after Martha's rule.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to optimal sepsis care - a systematized review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.BMC health services research · 2025Review
- Bundle compliance patterns in septic shock and their association with patient outcomes: an unsupervised cluster analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing the Sepsis Six Care Bundle (BLISS-1) Questionnaire.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Sepsis screening protocol implementation: a clinician-validated rapid realist review.BMJ open quality · 2024Review
- Article
- Associations between declining antibiotic use in primary care in Scotland and hospitalization with infection and patient satisfaction: longitudinal population study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- A multifaceted educational intervention improved anti-infectious measures but had no effect on mortality in patients with severe sepsis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators to the successful development, implementation and evaluation of care bundles in acute care in hospital: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- The Medical Perspective on a Disease Life Cycle. Sepsis in the Realm of Implementation Science.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018Article
- A narrative review of the impact of interventions in acute kidney injury.Journal of nephrology · 2018Review
- Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs.BMJ open quality · 2018Article
- Why do we fail to deliver evidence-based practice in critical care medicine?Current opinion in critical care · 2017Review
- Barriers and facilitators towards implementing the Sepsis Six care bundle (BLISS-1): a mixed methods investigation using the theoretical domains framework.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017Article
- How Are Qualitative Methods Used in Implementation Science Research? Results From a Systematic Scoping Review.Implementation research and practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementation of the 'Sepsis Six' clinical care bundle within an hour of recognition of sepsis is recommended as an approach to reduce mortality in patients with sepsis, but achieving reliable delivery of the bundle has proved challenging. There remains little understanding of the barriers to reliable implementation of bundle components. We examined frontline clinical practice in implementing the Sepsis Six.
methodsWe conducted an ethnographic study in six hospitals participating in the Scottish Patient Safety Programme Sepsis collaborative. We conducted around 300 h of non-participant observation in emergency departments, acute medical receiving units and medical and surgical wards. We interviewed a purposive sample of 43 members of hospital staff. Data were analysed using a constant comparative approach.
resultsImplementation strategies to promote reliable use of the Sepsis Six primarily focused on education, engaging and motivating staff, and providing prompts for behaviour, along with efforts to ensure that equipment required was readily available. Although these strategies were successful in raising staff awareness of sepsis and engagement with implementation, our study identified that completing the bundle within an hour was not straightforward. Our emergent theory suggested that rather than being an apparently simple sequence of six steps, the Sepsis Six actually involved a complex trajectory comprising multiple interdependent tasks that required prioritisation and scheduling, and which was prone to problems of coordination and operational failures. Interventions that involved allocating specific roles and responsibilities for completing the Sepsis Six in ways that reduced the need for coordination and task switching, and the use of process mapping to identify system failures along the trajectory, could help mitigate against some of these problems.
conclusionsImplementation efforts that focus on individual behaviour change to improve uptake of the Sepsis Six should be supplemented by an understanding of the bundle as a complex trajectory of work in which improving reliability requires attention to coordination of workflow, as well as addressing the mundane problems of interruptions and operational failures that obstruct task completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.