ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2016
Regional and social inequalities in the performance of Pap test and screening mammography and their correlation with lifestyle: Brazilian national health survey, 2013.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between socioeconomic context and getting preventive screenings among Brazilian women aged 50 years and older.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators of the implementation of mammography screening in the Brazilian public health system: scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Inequality by Skin Color in Breast Cancer Screening in Brazil: a Differences-in-Differences Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Article
- Time trend analysis and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mammography and Papanicolaou test coverage in Brazilian state capitals.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- [Analysis of the effect of mammography allocation on women's health indicators].Cadernos de saude publica · 2024Article
- Assessment of Sexual Health and Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among the Female Working Population.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Factors that Affect Performance of Clinical Breast Examination and Mammography Screening among Brazilian Women.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Cancer inequalities in incidence and mortality in the State of São Paulo, Brazil 2001-17.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- A nationwide pilot study on breast cancer screening in Peru.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Recent changes in trends of mortality from cervical cancer in Southeastern Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2023Article
- Pap smears in the extreme South of Brazil: low coverage and exposure of the most vulnerable pregnant women.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Papanicolaou test in Brazil: analysis of the National Health Survey of 2013 and 2019.Revista de saude publica · 2023Article
- Inequalities in Temporal Effects on Cervical Cancer Mortality in States in Different Geographic Regions of Brazil: An Ecological Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Clinically Relevant GermlineFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Factors related to mammography adherence among women in Brazil: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Breast and cervical cancer mortality in the western Amazon: A time series study between 1980 and 2014.Medicine · 2021Article
- Challenge of Incorporating New Drugs for Breast Cancer in Brazil: A Proposed Framework for Improving Access to Innovative Therapies.JCO global oncology · 2021Review
- The Global Burden of Disease Study Estimates of Brazil's Cervical Cancer Burden.Annals of global health · 2020Article
- Analysis of the effects of the age-period-birth cohort on cervical cancer mortality in the Brazilian Northeast.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMass population screening for the early detection of cervical and breast cancer has been shown to be a safe and effective strategy worldwide and has reduced the incidence and mortality rates of these diseases. The aim of this study is to analyse the reach of screening tests for cervical and breast cancer according to sociodemographic variables and to analyse their correlation with a healthy lifestyle.
methodsWe have analysed data collected from 31.845 women aged 18 and over, who were interviewed for the Brazilian National Health Survey, a nationwide household inquiry, which took place between August 2013 and February 2014. The Pap tests performed in the last 3 years in women aged between 25 and 64 and screening mammogram performed in the last 2 years in women aged between 50 and 69 were considered adequate. We identified habits that constitute a healthy lifestyle, such as the consumption of five or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables, 30 min or more of leisurely physical activity and not smoking.
resultsWe observed that the Pap test (78.8 %) was more widespread than the screening mammogram (54.5 %), with significant geographical and social differences concerning access to health care. Access for such screening was higher for women living in more developed regions (Southeast and South), who were white-skinned, better educated, living with a partner and, especially, who were covered by private health insurance. Those who underwent the tests according to established protocols also had a healthy lifestyle, which corroborates the healthy behaviour pattern of damage prevention.
conclusionDespite the progress made, social disparity still defines access to screening tests for cervical and breast cancer, with women covered by private health insurance tending to benefit the most. It is necessary to reduce social and regional inequalities and ensure a more uniform provision and access to the tests, especially for socially disadvantaged women, in order to reduce the incidence and mortality rate resulting from the aforementioned diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.