Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852240›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Identification of priorities for improvement of medication safety in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study.

Lorainne Tudor Car, Nikolaos Papachristou, Joseph Gallagher, Rajvinder Samra, Kerri Wazny, Mona El-Khatib, Adrian Bull, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin, Rifat Atun and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient Safety Domains in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: A multimethod study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Lorainne Tudor CarDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.tudor.car@imperial.ac.uk.
Nikolaos PapachristouDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joseph GallagherUCD Conway Institute, gHealth Research Group, The University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Rajvinder SamraFaculty of Health & Social Care, Health & Social Care Programme, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Kerri WaznyUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Global Health Research, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Mona El-KhatibDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adrian BullImperial College Health Partners, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul AylinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rifat AtunDepartment of Global Health and Population & Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard, Boston, USA.
Igor RudanUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Centre for Global Health Research, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Josip CarHealth Services and Outcomes Research Programme, LKCMedicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Helen BellCentre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Charles VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bryony Dean FranklinCentre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust/UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBHarvard Global Health Institute · USImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKings Health Partners · GBNanyang Technological University · SGThe Open University · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication error is a frequent, harmful and costly patient safety incident. Research to date has mostly focused on medication errors in hospitals. In this study, we aimed to identify the main causes of, and solutions to, medication error in primary care.

methodsWe used a novel priority-setting method for identifying and ranking patient safety problems and solutions called PRIORITIZE. We invited 500 North West London primary care clinicians to complete an open-ended questionnaire to identify three main problems and solutions relating to medication error in primary care. 113 clinicians submitted responses, which we thematically synthesized into a composite list of 48 distinct problems and 45 solutions. A group of 57 clinicians randomly selected from the initial cohort scored these and an overall ranking was derived. The agreement between the clinicians' scores was presented using the average expert agreement (AEA). The study was conducted between September 2013 and November 2014.

resultsThe top three problems were incomplete reconciliation of medication during patient 'hand-overs', inadequate patient education about their medication use and poor discharge summaries. The highest ranked solutions included development of a standardized discharge summary template, reduction of unnecessary prescribing, and minimisation of polypharmacy. Overall, better communication between the healthcare provider and patient, quality assurance approaches during medication prescribing and monitoring, and patient education on how to use their medication were considered the top priorities. The highest ranked suggestions received the strongest agreement among the clinicians, i.e. the highest AEA score.

conclusionsClinicians identified a range of suggestions for better medication management, quality assurance procedures and patient education. According to clinicians, medication errors can be largely prevented with feasible and affordable interventions. PRIORITIZE is a new, convenient, systematic, and replicable method, and merits further exploration with a view to becoming a part of a routine preventative patient safety monitoring mechanism.

Indexed as

Medication ReconciliationPatient SafetyCommunicationDrug PrescriptionsHealth Care SurveysHumansInappropriate PrescribingLondonPatient Discharge SummariesPatient Education as TopicPatient HandoffPolypharmacyPrimary Health CareCliniciansCrowd-sourcingMedication errorPatient safetyPrimary carePriority-setting

Identifiers

PMID27852240
PMCPMC5112691
OpenAlexW2553266358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.