Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27852049›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

A nomogram to predict the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis in female patients with breast cancer in China: A nationwide, multicenter, 10-year epidemiological study.

Jian Zhang, Xiao Li, Rong Huang, Wei-Liang Feng, Ya-Nan Kong, Feng Xu, Lin Zhao, Qing-Kun Song, Jing Li, Bao-Ning Zhang and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jian ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China.
Rong HuangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Wei-Liang FengDepartment of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, P.R. China.
Ya-Nan KongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Feng XuDepartment of Breast-thyroid Surgery, Xiangya Second Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, P.R. China.
Lin ZhaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, P.R. China.
Qing-Kun SongDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Jing LiDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Bao-Ning ZhangCenter of Breast Disease, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Jin-Hu FanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
You-Lin QiaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Xiao-Ming XieDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Shan ZhengDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China.
Jian-Jun HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China.
Ke WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNCentral South University · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone may lead to postoperative complications. Among patients with positive ALN in the preoperative examination, approximately 40% patients do not have SLN metastasis. Herein, we aimed to develop a model to predict the probability of ALN metastasis as a preoperative tool to support clinical decision-making. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of 4211 female patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed in seven breast cancer centers representing entire China, over 10 years (1999-2008). The patients were randomly categorized into a training cohort or validation cohort (3:1 ratio). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for 1869 patients with complete information on the study variables. Age at diagnosis, tumor size, tumor quadrant, clinical nodal status, local invasion status, pathological type, and molecular subtypes were the independent predictors of ALN metastasis. The nomogram was then developed using the seven variables. Further, it was subsequently validated in 642 patients with complete data on variables in the validation cohort. Coefficient of determination (R²) and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated to be 0.979 and 0.7007, showing good calibration and discrimination of the model, respectively. The false-negative rates of the nomogram were 0 and 6.9% for the predicted risk cut-off values of 14.03% and 20%, respectively. Therefore, when the predicted risk is less than 20%, SLNB may be avoided. After further validation in various patient populations, this model may support increasingly limited axillary surgery in breast cancer.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAxillaBreast NeoplasmsChinaClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedRandom AllocationROC CurveSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyaxillary lymph node metastasisbreast cancernomogramprediction model

Identifiers

PMID27852049
PMCPMC5471057
OpenAlexW2549835484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.