Trial reportOncotarget2016
Sunitinib for the treatment of benign and malignant neoplasms from von Hippel-Lindau disease: A single-arm, prospective phase II clinical study from the PREDIR group.
Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Belzutifan for Renal Cell Carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease.The New England journal of medicine · 2021Trial
- Pazopanib in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2018Trial
- Review
- Von-Hipple Lindau syndrome with family history: a case report and seventeen years follow-up study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Selective HIF2A Inhibitors in the Management of Clear Cell Renal Cancer and Von Hippel-Lindau-Disease-Associated Tumors.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Neurological applications of belzutifan in von Hippel-Lindau disease.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Systemic Therapy Development in Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: An Outsized Contribution from an Orphan Disease.Cancers · 2022Review
- Multidisciplinary management of patients diagnosed with von Hippel-Lindau disease: A practical review of the literature for clinicians.Asian journal of urology · 2022Review
- Intermixed arteriovenous malformation and hemangioblastoma: case report and literature review.CNS oncology · 2020Review
- Targeting β2-Adrenergic Receptors Shows Therapeutical Benefits in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Von Hippel-Lindau Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- The importance of genetic study and long-term management in patients with bilateral pheochromocytomas.Archive of clinical cases · 2019Article
- A retrospective case study of sunitinib treatment in three patients with Von Hippel-Lindau disease.Cancer biology & therapy · 2018Article
- New Perspectives on Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Toward a Molecular Classification.Endocrine reviews · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome that predisposes affected individuals to the development of multiple benign and malignant tumors. One of the main manifestations of VHL is renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCC is increasingly being treated with targeted therapies, which offer an alternative treatment option for patients with VHL disease. This study investigated the effectiveness of sunitinib in VHL patients with advanced tumors or tumors unsuitable for surgery.This multicenter, phase II, open-label study from the PREDIR VHL network, treated patients with genetically-confirmed advanced VHL disease with oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 28 days then a 2-week rest period) until progression. Lesions were performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic (CT) scan. The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included tolerability and overall survival.All five patients showed stable disease as best response at 6 months. Two patients showed impressive transitory clinical improvement during early cycles. No patient died during sunitinib treatment. Reasons for discontinuing sunitinib therapy were disease progression (n=1), unacceptable toxicity (n=3) and lack of clinical improvement after 7 cycles (10.5 months) with unacceptable toxicity (n=1).In conclusion, sunitinib was of limited benefit in patients with advanced VHL disease, but had better efficacy against metastatic RCC than other VHL-related lesions. Treatment-related toxicity is an important limiting factor in this frail patient population. New agents with different mechanisms of action are required to treat this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.