Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27851941›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Antimicrobial Peptides Share a Common Interaction Driven by Membrane Line Tension Reduction.

J Michael Henderson, Alan J Waring, Frances Separovic, Ka Yee C Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. To Close or to Collapse: The Role of Charges on Membrane Stability upon Pore Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J Michael HendersonDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; The James Frank Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Alan J WaringLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California; Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Frances SeparovicSchool of Chemistry, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ka Yee C LeeDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; The James Frank Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: kayeelee@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a class of host-defense molecules that neutralize a broad range of pathogens. Their membrane-permeabilizing behavior has been commonly attributed to the formation of pores; however, with the continuing discovery of AMPs, many are uncharacterized and their exact mechanism remains unknown. Using atomic force microscopy, we previously characterized the disruption of model membranes by protegrin-1 (PG-1), a cationic AMP from pig leukocytes. When incubated with zwitterionic membranes of dimyristoylphosphocholine, PG-1 first induced edge instability at low concentrations, then porous defects at intermediate concentrations, and finally worm-like micelle structures at high concentrations. These rich structural changes suggested that pore formation constitutes only an intermediate state along the route of PG-1's membrane disruption process. The formation of these structures could be best understood by using a mesophase framework of a binary mixture of lipids and peptides, where PG-1 acts as a line-active agent in lowering interfacial bilayer tensions. We have proposed that rather than being static pore formers, AMPs share a common ability to lower interfacial tensions that promote membrane transformations. In a study of 13 different AMPs, we found that peptide line-active behavior was not driven by the overall charge, and instead was correlated with their adoption of imperfect secondary structures. These peptide structures commonly positioned charged residues near the membrane interface to promote deformation favorable for their incorporation into the membrane. Uniquely, the data showed that barrel-stave-forming peptides such as alamethicin are not line-active, and that the seemingly disparate models of toroidal pores and carpet activity are actually related. We speculate that this interplay between peptide structure and the distribution of polar residues in relation to the membrane governs AMP line activity in general and represents a novel, to our knowledge, avenue for the rational design of new drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell MembraneNonlinear DynamicsPorosityProtein BindingSwineAntimicrobial Cationic Peptidesprotegrin-1

Identifiers

PMID27851941
PMCPMC5113125
OpenAlexW2552038973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.