ReviewJAMA cardiology2017
Existing and Emerging Payment and Delivery Reforms in Cardiology.
Review in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medicare Payment Trends in Pulmonology and Critical Care (2003-2024).CHEST pulmonary · 2026Article
- Financial Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infections After Coronary Surgery: A Microcosting Analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2023Observational
- Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2022Review
- Comparison of deep learning with traditional models to predict preventable acute care use and spending among heart failure patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Inconsistent Reporting of Potential Conflicts of Interest Disclosure.JAMA cardiology · 2019Article
- Drivers of Variation in 90-Day Episode Payments After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2019Article
- Clinical Model to Predict 90-Day Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Article
- Dual Healthcare System Use During Episodes of Acute Care Heart Failure Associated With Higher Healthcare Utilization and Mortality Risk.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Association of Medical Liability Reform With Clinician Approach to Coronary Artery Disease Management.JAMA cardiology · 2018Article
- Association Between 30-Day Episode Payments and Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Observational
- Targeting the Correct Population When Designing Transitional Care Programs for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure.JAMA cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Recent health care reforms aim to increase patient access, reduce costs, and improve health care quality as payers turn to payment reform for greater value. Cardiologists need to understand emerging payment models to succeed in the evolving payment landscape. We review existing payment and delivery reforms that affect cardiologists, present 4 emerging examples, and consider their implications for clinical practice. Observations: Public and commercial payers have recently implemented payment reforms and new models are evolving. Most cardiology models are modified fee-for-service or address procedural or episodic care, but population models are also emerging. Although there is widespread agreement that payment reform is needed, existing programs have significant limitations and the adoption of new programs has been slow. New payment reforms address some of these problems, but many details remain undefined. Conclusions and Relevance: Early payment reforms were voluntary and cardiologists' participation is variable. However, conventional fee-for-service will become less viable, and enrollment in new payment models will be unavoidable. Early participation in new payment models will allow clinicians to develop expertise in new care pathways during a period of relatively lower risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.