ArticlePloS one2016
Speeding Access to Vaccines and Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Case for Change and a Framework for Optimized Product Market Authorization.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory fragmentation as the hidden barrier to regional vaccine sovereignty.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Drug and country characteristics associated with global approval and launch of FDA-approved novel therapeutics.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Lipid-based nanocarriers for antifungal drug delivery.Discover nano · 2026Review
- An analysis of the registration of essential medicines in Namibia: a proxy measure of the availability of essential medicines.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- The registration status of maternal, newborn, and child health medical products: evidence from 9 countries.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Overcoming barriers to medical countermeasures: Strengthening global biosecurity.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Africa finally has its own drug-regulation agency - and it could transform the continent's health.Nature · 2025Article
- Strengthening Vaccine Regulation: Insights from COVID-19 Vaccines, Best Practices, and Lessons for Future Public Health Emergencies.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Regulatory Review Time of Vaccine Approvals in China Between 2005 and 2024.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Comparison of the review models and regulatory timelines of seven countries participating in the ECOWAS-MRH initiative: identifying opportunities for improvement.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Trust Beyond Borders: European External Regulatory Influence on Access to Medicines.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
- The process of ratifying the treaty to establish the African Medicines Agency: perspectives of national regulatory agencies.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Novel approaches to enable equitable access to monoclonal antibodies in low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2024Review
- The role of global health partnerships in vaccine equity: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Geographical and practical challenges in the implementation of digital health passports for cross-border COVID-19 pandemic management: a narrative review and framework for solutions.Globalization and health · 2023Review
- Common ground: the opportunity of male contraceptives as MPTs.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Article
- Respiratory syncytial virus prevention within reach: the vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2023Review
- The domestication of the African Union model law on medical products regulation: Perceived benefits, enabling factors, and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Best practices in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative: Perspectives of regulators and medicines manufacturers.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Public support in the United States for global equity in vaccine pricing.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe United Nations Millennium Development Goals galvanized global efforts to alleviate suffering of the world's poorest people through unprecedented public-private partnerships. Donor aid agencies have demonstrably saved millions of lives that might otherwise have been lost to disease through increased access to quality-assured vaccines and medicines. Yet, the introduction of these health interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) continues to face a time lag due to factors which remain poorly understood. METHODS AND
findingsA recurring theme from our partnership engagements was that an optimized regulatory process would contribute to improved access to quality health products. Therefore, we investigated the current system for medicine and vaccine registration in LMICs as part of our comprehensive regulatory strategy. Here, we report a fact base of the registration timelines for vaccines and drugs used to treat certain communicable diseases in LMICs. We worked with a broad set of stakeholders, including the World Health Organization's prequalification team, national regulatory authorities, manufacturers, procurers, and other experts, and collected data on the timelines between first submission and last approval of applications for product registration sub-Saharan Africa. We focused on countries with the highest burden of communicable disease and the greatest need for the products studied. The data showed a typical lag of 4 to 7 years between the first regulatory submission which was usually to a regulatory agency in a high-income country, and the final approval in Sub-Saharan Africa. Two of the three typical registration steps which products undergo before delivery in the countries involve lengthy timelines. Failure to leverage or rely on the findings from reviews already performed by competent regulatory authorities, disparate requirements for product approval by the countries, and lengthy timelines by manufacturers to respond to regulatory queries were key underlying factors for the delays.
conclusionsWe propose a series of measures which we developed in close collaboration with key stakeholders that could be taken to reduce registration time and to make safe, effective medicines more quickly available in countries where they are most needed. Many of these recommendations are being implemented by the responsible stakeholders, including the WHO prequalification team and the national regulatory authorities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Those efforts will be the focus of subsequent publications by the pertinent groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.