Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27849572›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Standing genetic variation in a tissue-specific enhancer underlies selfing-syndrome evolution in Capsella.

Adrien Sicard, Christian Kappel, Young Wha Lee, Natalia Joanna Woźniak, Cindy Marona, John R Stinchcombe, Stephen I Wright, Michael Lenhard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Natural variation of GhSI7 increases seed index in cotton.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  9. The selfing syndrome and beyond: diverse evolutionary consequences of mating system transitions in plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrien SicardInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; adrien.sicard@uni-potsdam.de michael.lenhard@uni-potsdam.de.
Christian KappelInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1450-1864
Young Wha LeeDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2.
Natalia Joanna WoźniakInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Cindy MaronaInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
John R StinchcombeDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2.
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2.
Michael LenhardInstitut für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; adrien.sicard@uni-potsdam.de michael.lenhard@uni-potsdam.de.
University of Potsdam · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

European Research Council 260455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating system shifts recurrently drive specific changes in organ dimensions. The shift in mating system from out-breeding to selfing is one of the most frequent evolutionary transitions in flowering plants and is often associated with an organ-specific reduction in flower size. However, the evolutionary paths along which polygenic traits, such as size, evolve are poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear how natural selection can specifically modulate the size of one organ despite the pleiotropic action of most known growth regulators. Here, we demonstrate that allelic variation in the intron of a general growth regulator contributed to the specific reduction of petal size after the transition to selfing in the genus Capsella Variation within this intron affects an organ-specific enhancer that regulates the level of STERILE APETALA (SAP) protein in the developing petals. The resulting decrease in SAP activity leads to a shortening of the cell proliferation period and reduced number of petal cells. The absence of private polymorphisms at the causal region in the selfing species suggests that the small-petal allele was captured from standing genetic variation in the ancestral out-crossing population. Petal-size variation in the current out-crossing population indicates that several small-effect mutations have contributed to reduce petal-size. These data demonstrate how tissue-specific regulatory elements in pleiotropic genes contribute to organ-specific evolution. In addition, they provide a plausible evolutionary explanation for the rapid evolution of flower size after the out-breeding-to-selfing transition based on additive effects of segregating alleles.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCapsellaEnhancer Elements, GeneticFlowersMagnoliopsidaOrgan SpecificityPhenotypePollinationQuantitative Trait LociReproductionSelection, GeneticSelf-Fertilizationgrowth controlintronic cis-regulatory elementmorphological evolutionorgan-specific evolutionstanding variation

Identifiers

PMID27849572
PMCPMC5137693
OpenAlexW2554240878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.