Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27848976›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2016

Tea-induced calmness: Sugar-sweetened tea calms consumers exposed to acute stressor.

Shilpa S Samant, Katherine Wilkes, Zephania Odek, Han-Seok Seo

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shilpa S SamantDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Katherine WilkesDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Zephania OdekDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Han-Seok SeoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The food and beverage industry has been increasingly replacing sugar with non-nutritive sweeteners in their sweetened products to control or reduce total calories. Research comparing the effect of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on emotional state of participants exposed to acute stressors is still limited. This study aimed to determine the effect of drinking tea sweetened with either a nutritive sweetener (sugar) or a non-nutritive sweetener (sucralose or stevia) on emotional state, in terms of calmness and pleasantness, of participants exposed to an acute stressor. Effects of acute stress on sweetness intensity and overall liking of tea beverages were also determined. Results showed that the possibility of tea-induced calmness, calculated as the difference between calmness ratings after and before drinking a tea sample, was established on stress session in the sugar-sweetened tea. Overall liking, but not the sweetness intensity, of the sugar-sweetened tea was affected by acute stress. In conclusion, this study provides empirical evidence that the consumption of tea sweetened with nutritive sweetener, but not with non-nutritive sweetener, has calming effect on consumers with acute stress, suggesting that this effect may not be due to the sweet taste of sugar, but due to the caloric nature of the sweetener.

Indexed as

TeaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalSugarsSweetening AgentsSugarsSweetening AgentsTea

Identifiers

PMID27848976
PMCPMC5111075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.