Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27848234›Full record

ArticleDrugs in R&D2017

Tolerability of Capecitabine Monotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study.

Laura W Leicher, Jacques C de Graaf, Wilko Coers, Metin Tascilar, Jan Willem B de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in R&D, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hand-foot syndrome in cancer patients on capecitabine: examining prevalence, impacts, and associated risk factors at a cancer centre in Malaysia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. InoperableMolecular and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura W LeicherIsala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jacques C de GraafIsala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Wilko CoersMeducom BV, Noordspierdijkerweg 185, Spierdijk, The Netherlands.
Metin TascilarIsala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem B de GrootIsala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands. j.w.b.de.groot@isala.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapecitabine monotherapy is a treatment option for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is administered to up to 17% of patients. Data are limited with regard to adverse events and dosing practices associated with capecitabine monotherapy in real-world situations.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to provide real-world data on adverse event rates and dose adjustments/discontinuations associated with capecitabine monotherapy in patients with mCRC.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from CRC patients scheduled to receive up to eight planned cycles of capecitabine monotherapy between 2009 and 2013 at a single large community hospital in The Netherlands. Data on adverse events (hand-foot syndrome [HFS], gastrointestinal (GI) events, hematological adverse events, and cardiotoxicity), as well as relative dose intensities (RDIs), dose reductions, and discontinuations, were evaluated.

resultsData from 86 patients (45 females; mean age at the start of treatment, 69 years) were included. A total of 46.5% of patients experienced HFS and 44.2% experienced a GI event at some time during treatment. Hematological events and cardiotoxicity were rare. Most patients (77%) started at below the recommended dose, and patients at the lowest dose also had the lowest median RDIs. Dose reductions and discontinuations occurred in 15-25% of patients who experienced HFS or GI event over the course of eight cycles.

conclusionsHFS and GI events were very common in patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy in a real-world clinical setting. Most patients started treatment at below the recommended dose, and 15-25% of patients who had HFS or a GI event had a dose reduction or discontinuation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesCapecitabine

Identifiers

PMID27848234
PMCPMC5318322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.