Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2016
Uptake of evidence-based physical activity programs: comparing perceptions of adopters and nonadopters.
Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of an Integrated Research-Practice Partnership to Improve Outcomes of a Community-Based Strength-Training Program for Older Adults: Reach and Effect of Lifelong Improvements through Fitness Together (LIFT).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Trial
- Article
- Scale-up influences and definitions of scale-up 'success': evidence from globally scaled interventions.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- A natural experiment to determine if FitEx works: Impact of a statewide walking program.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Adaptations to a statewide walking program: Use of iterative feedback cycles between research and delivery systems improves fit for over 10 years.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Adjust your own oxygen mask before helping those around you: an autoethnography of participatory research.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Using Integrated Research-Practice Partnerships to Move Evidence-Based Principles Into Practice.Exercise and sport sciences reviews · 2019Article
- Evaluating "Take the Stairs, Wyoming!" Through the RE-AIM Framework: Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Dissemination and Implementation Science for Public Health Professionals: An Overview and Call to Action.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Review
- Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Article
- Beginning With the End in Mind: Contextual Considerations for Scaling-Out a Community-Based Intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- RE-AIM in Clinical, Community, and Corporate Settings: Perspectives, Strategies, and Recommendations to Enhance Public Health Impact.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Informed Adaptations of a Strength-Training Program through a Research-Practice Partnership.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Translating evidence-based physical activity interventions into practice have been problematic. Limited research exists on the adoption decision-making process. This study explored health educator perceptions of two evidence-based, physical activity programs-one was developed through an integrated research-practice partnership approach (FitEx) and the other was research-developed, Active Living Every Day (ALED). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 health educators who were trained on either ALED (n = 6) or FitEx (n = 6) and had either delivered (n = 6) or did not deliver (n = 6) the intervention. Program adopters identified with program characteristics, materials, processes, implementation, fit within system, and collaborations as more positive factors in decision-making when compared to those that did not deliver. FitEx health educators were more likely to deliver the program and found it to be a better fit and easier to use. An integrated research-practice partnership may improve adoption of physical activity programs in typical practice settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.