SynthesisWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017
Diagnostic accuracy of the
Synthesis in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Urea breath test forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical validation of a fecal PCR assay forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Observational
- Optimal post-gastroscopy timing of the urea [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Optical detection using CRISPR-Cas12a of Helicobacter pylori for veterinary applications.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hp and New Gastric Cancer Screening Scoring System for Screening and Prevention of Gastric Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Current and Future Perspectives in the Diagnosis and Management ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Traditional and Modern Diagnostic Approaches in Diagnosing PediatricChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Evolution of Diagnostic Methods forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Chinese Consensus Report on Family-BasedGut · 2022Article
- A re-testing range is recommended forGut pathogens · 2021Article
- Prevalence ofInternational journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy for Prevention of Gastric Cancer: A Markov Model.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Diet and rosacea: the role of dietary change in the management of rosacea.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo summarize and appraise the available literature regarding the use of the
methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Journals Full-text (CNKI) and CBMDisc databases to identify published data regarding the sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of diagnostic accuracy of the
resultsEighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results indicated that the
conclusionsThe UBT has high accuracy for diagnosing H. pylori infections in adult patients with dyspepsia. However, the reliability of these diagnostic meta-analytic estimates is limited by significant heterogeneity due to unknown factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27848071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.