Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27848027›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017

Different effects of dietary factors on reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease in 11,690 Korean subjects.

Su Youn Nam, Bum Joon Park, Yeong-Ah Cho, Kum Hei Ryu, Il Ju Choi, Sohee Park, Young-Woo Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Su Youn NamKyungpook National University Medical Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 702-210, South Korea. mascha@medimail.co.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-7714
Bum Joon ParkCenter for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Yeong-Ah ChoDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Kum Hei RyuKyungpook National University Medical Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 702-210, South Korea.
Il Ju ChoiCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Sohee ParkCancer Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Young-Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
National Cancer Center · KRKyungpook National University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough dietary factors seem to be associated with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, their effects on reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) are unclear. We evaluate dietary effects on NERD and reflux esophagitis.

methodsA total of 11,690 health check-up persons completed questionnaires for reflux symptoms and 3-day recordings for dietary intake and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy from 2004 to 2008. Multiple logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the relationship of dietary components with NERD or reflux esophagitis.

resultsPrevalence of NERD and reflux esophagitis was 7.7 and 7.2%, respectively. In adjusted analysis, highest quartile of beans (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95), 3rd quartile of vegetables (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91), 4th quartile of fruit (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95), 4th quartile of egg (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.96), and 3rd quartile of fish (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98), and 4th quartile of milk (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94) reduced NERD. Reflux esophagitis had no association with food groups, whereas it was related with men, absence of H. pylori, hiatal hernia, BMI, and total energy intake. Furthermore, dietary effect on NERD was similar in men and women, whereas highest tertile of potato (OR 1.91) and milk (OR 1.87) increased reflux esophagitis only in women.

conclusionsWhile many food groups affected NERD, reflux esophagitis was associated with BMI and total energy intake rather than dietary component. These results may suggest different approaches toward dietary management of NERD and reflux esophagitis.

Indexed as

DietFoodAdultAnimalsBody Mass IndexDiet RecordsEggsEsophagitis, PepticFabaceaeFemaleFruitGastroesophageal RefluxHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHernia, HiatalHumansDietNon-erosive reflux diseaseReflux esophagitis

Identifiers

PMID27848027
OpenAlexW2556779157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.