Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27847977›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Does a different dose of gamma irradiation have the same effect on five different types of tendon allografts? - a biomechanical study.

Gyorgy Hangody, Gábor Szebényi, Bence Abonyi, Rita Kiss, László Hangody, Károly Pap

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Biomechanical considerations are crucial for the success of tendon and meniscus allograft integration-a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gyorgy HangodyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Uzsoki Street 29-41, 1145, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor SzebényiCooperation Research Center for Biomechanics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Bertalan Lajos Street 2, 1111, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence AbonyiDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Uzsoki Street 29-41, 1145, Budapest, Hungary.
Rita KissCooperation Research Center for Biomechanics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Bertalan Lajos Street 2, 1111, Budapest, Hungary.
László HangodyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Uzsoki Street 29-41, 1145, Budapest, Hungary.
Károly PapDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Uzsoki Street 29-41, 1145, Budapest, Hungary. drpapster@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe goals of our study were to evaluate the biomechanical differences between five tendons and the changes in biomechanical properties caused by irradiation.

methodsAchilles, quadriceps, semitendinosus + gracilis (STG), tibialis anterior (TA) and the peroneus longus (PL) were harvested from 30 donors. Group A contained 50 tendons without gamma irradiation. The groups were irradiated with a dose of 21 kGy (group B 50 tendons) and with a dose of 42 kGy (group C 50 tendons). The grafts were soaked in a radio-protectant solution and frozen at -80 °C. Cyclic loading tests were performed followed by load to failure tests. Young modulus of elasticity, maximum force, strain at tensile strength and strain at rupture were calculated.

resultsThe Achilles tendons had significantly lower Young modulus than the TA (p = 0.0036) in group A. The Achilles showed significantly lower than PL (p = 0.000042) and TA (p = 0.00142) in group B and C. The quadriceps and the ST (p = 0.0037) provided poorer values than the TA (p = 0.0432) in group C. We found no difference in maximum loads among the tendons in group A. The maximum load of the Achilles and quadriceps showed better results than the PL (p = 0.0016), (p = 0.0018) and the STG (p = 0.0066), (p = 0.0019) in group C. The TA had similar results like the Achilles and quadriceps. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe vulnerability of gamma irradiation of TA was less than Achilles and quadriceps tendons.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAllograftsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverElasticityGamma RaysHumansMuscle, SkeletalTendonsTensile StrengthTissue DonorsTransplantation, HomologousAllograft tendonBiomechanical testingCryopreservingGamma irradiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.