Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27847817›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2016

Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.

Woong Bae Yoon, Ji Eun Oh, Eun Young Chae, Hak Hee Kim, Soo Yeul Lee, Kwang Gi Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning-based breast region extraction of mammographic images combining pre-processing methods and semantic segmentation supported by Deeplab v3.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woong Bae YoonBiomedical Engineering Branch, Division of Convergence Technology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3901-5192
Ji Eun OhBiomedical Engineering Branch, Division of Convergence Technology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1953-9845
Eun Young ChaeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hak Hee KimDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Yeul LeeElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-0690
Kwang Gi KimBiomedical Engineering Branch, Division of Convergence Technology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-6038
National Cancer Center · KRElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computer-aided detection (CAD) systems have been developed to help radiologists with the early detection of breast cancer. This system provides objective and accurate information to reduce the misdiagnosis of the disease. In mammography, the pectoral muscle region is used as an index to compare the symmetry between the left and right images in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. The pectoral muscle segmentation is necessary for the detection of microcalcification or mass because the pectoral muscle has a similar pixel intensity as that of lesions, which affects the results of automatic detection. In this study, the mammographic image analysis society database (MIAS, 322 cases) was used for detecting the pectoral muscle segmentation. The pectoral muscle was detected by using the morphological method and the random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. We evaluated the detected pectoral muscle region and compared the manual segmentation with the automatic segmentation. The results showed 92.2% accuracy. We expect that the proposed method improves the detection accuracy of breast cancer lesions using a CAD system.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographyPattern Recognition, AutomatedPectoralis MusclesRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27847817
PMCPMC5099485
OpenAlexW2537794659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.