Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27847614›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2015

Metamizole versus placebo for panretinal photocoagulation pain control: a prospective double-masked randomized controlled study.

Rafael Barbosa de Araújo, Leandro Cabral Zacharias, Breno Marques de Azevedo, Beatrice Schmidt Giusti, Rony Carlos Pretti, Walter Y Takahashi, Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafael Barbosa de AraújoAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-1093
Leandro Cabral ZachariasAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Breno Marques de AzevedoAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Beatrice Schmidt GiustiAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Rony Carlos PrettiAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Walter Y TakahashiAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Mário Luiz Ribeiro MonteiroAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 05403-000 Brazil.
Hospital Municipal Souza Aguiar · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy is one of most common and threatening ocular diseases. Many of these patients need to be submitted to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), experiencing a significant level of pain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of oral metamizole in reducing pain during PRP in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (VSNDR).

methodsPatients from a single center with PDR or VSNDR and indication of bilateral PRP were recruited for a double-masked, controlled, prospective study. The treated eyes were randomly assigned in two groups, and each patient had one eye assigned per group. Group A received 1000 mg of metamizole and group B received a placebo pill 40 min before the laser treatment. The groups were switched for the treatment of the fellow eye. Each patient scored the pain sensation immediately after each PRP section using Scott's visual analogue scale (VAS). The paired Student t test was used to measure the significance between the two groups VAS scores, with significance level adopted of

resultsTwenty-one patients were recruited. The level of pain was significantly lower when submitted to PRP after oral metamizole treatment compared to placebo (p = 0.002). The mean pain scores for groups A and B were 4.72 ± 1.708 and 5.89 ± 1.967, respectively. The minimum/maximum scores within groups A and B were 1/8 and 1/10, respectively.

conclusionsThe use of 1000 mg of metamizole 40 min before PRP significantly reduces the pain associated with the procedure in patients with PDR or VSNDR.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaDiabetic retinopathyMetamizolePain scorePanretinal photocoagulation

Identifiers

PMID27847614
PMCPMC5088477
OpenAlexW2173483741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.