ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2017
Validation of the Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System in Determining Prognosis of the North American Patients Following Intra-arterial Therapy.
Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2022Guideline
- Comparison of prognostic accuracy of HCC staging systems in patients undergoing TACE.Clinical imaging · 2025Article
- Is YouTube™ a useful source of information on home parenteral nutrition?BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Hong Kong consensus statements on unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: narrative review and update for 2021.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023Review
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of liver cancer · 2023Review
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Contemporary Algorithm for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2021: The Northwestern Approach.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence in assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Review
- Review
- Article
- Key Enzymes in Pyrimidine Synthesis, CAD and CPS1, Predict Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2021Article
- Therapy of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Clinical Practice.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020Review
- Validation of prognostic accuracy of MESH, HKLC, and BCLC classifications in a large German cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020Article
- A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Review
- A machine learning model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2019Article
- Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Review
- The Prognostic Ability of Major Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging Systems Is Improved by Including a Treatment Variable.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Article
- Hong Kong Consensus Statements for the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2018Article
- New concepts in embolotherapy of HCC.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThere is debate over the best way to stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We attempted to validate the prognostic and clinical utility of the recently developed Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system, a hepatitis B-based model, and compared data with that from the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system in a North American population that underwent intra-arterial therapy (IAT).
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data from 1009 patients with HCC who underwent IAT from 2000 through 2014. Most patients had hepatitis C or unresectable tumors; all patients underwent IAT, with or without resection, transplantation, and/or systemic chemotherapy. We calculated HCC stage for each patient using 5-stage HKLC (HKLC-5) and 9-stage HKLC (HKLC-9) system classifications, and the BCLC system. Survival information was collected up until the end of 2014 at which point living or unconfirmed patients were censored. We compared performance of the BCLC, HKLC-5, and HKLC-9 systems in predicting patient outcomes using Kaplan-Meier estimates, calibration plots, C statistic, Akaike information criterion, and the likelihood ratio test.
resultsMedian overall survival time, calculated from first IAT until date of death or censorship, for the entire cohort (all stages) was 9.8 months. The BCLC and HKLC staging systems predicted patient survival times with significance (P < .001). HKLC-5 and HKLC-9 each demonstrated good calibration. The HKLC-5 system outperformed the BCLC system in predicting patient survival times (HKLC C = 0.71, Akaike information criterion = 6242; BCLC C = 0.64, Akaike information criterion = 6320), reducing error in predicting survival time (HKLC reduced error by 14%, BCLC reduced error by 12%), and homogeneity (HKLC chi-square = 201, P < .001; BCLC chi-square = 119, P < .001) and monotonicity (HKLC linear trend chi-square = 193, P < .001; BCLC linear trend chi-square = 111, P < .001). Small proportions of patients with HCC of stages IV or V, according to the HKLC system, survived for 6 months and 4 months, respectively.
conclusionsIn a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent IAT for unresectable HCC, we found the HKLC-5 staging system to have the best combination of performances in survival separation, calibration, and discrimination; it consistently outperformed the BCLC system in predicting survival times of patients. The HKLC system identified patients with HCC of stages IV and V who are unlikely to benefit from IAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.