Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27847100›Full record

Observational studyThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2016

Thrombolytic therapy delay is independent predictor of mortality in acute pulmonary embolism at emergency service.

İnan Beydilli, Fevzi Yılmaz, Bedriye Müge Sönmez, Nalan Kozacı, Akar Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil Toksul, Ramazan Güven, Mustafa Avcı

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is Bedside End-Tidal COJournal of clinical medicine research · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

İnan BeydilliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey. Electronic address: inan_beydilli@hotmail.com.
Fevzi YılmazDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Bedriye Müge SönmezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Nalan KozacıDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Akar YılmazDepartment of Cardiology, İzmir University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
İbrahim Halil ToksulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Ramazan GüvenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Bitlis State Hospital, Bitlis, Turkey.
Mustafa AvcıDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Delays in diagnosis or therapy may result in sudden, fatal deterioration; therefore, rapid diagnosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach are needed. We aimed to investigate the effect of delaying thrombolytic administration on the mortality rate in a suspected PE. We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive patients who were aged 18 years or older and received thrombolysis for a high-risk PE without a major contraindication. All patients were classified according to the time of onset of the thrombolytic therapy. Patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest were analyzed from the time of admission to thrombolytic administration with 10-minute cutoff values. Data were analyzed by a regression analysis and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for significant and independent associated risk factors and in-hospital mortality. Mortality was seen in 17 of the 49 cases. Thirteen of these had received thrombolytic therapy 1 hour after their emergency department (ED) admission. Among all cases, the mortality rate was 35%. The ROC analysis indicated that a > 97-second delayed thrombolytic administration time was associated with mortality with 53% sensitivity and 91% specificity (area under the curve, 0.803; 95% confidence interval, 0.668-0.938). In the logistic regression, a 5-minute delay in thrombolytic therapy (beta = 1.342; 95% confidence interval, 1.818-2.231; p = 0.001) was associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable model. No major bleeding complications were seen in PE survivors. We conclude that early onset thrombolytic therapy in the ED for high-risk and hemodynamically worsening patients appears safe and life-saving.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalThrombolytic TherapyAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDemographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismRegression AnalysisROC CurveEchocardiographyThromboembolismThrombolytic agent

Identifiers

PMID27847100
PMCPMC11916484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.