Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846928›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action

The role of implementation science training in global health: from the perspective of graduates of the field's first dedicated doctoral program.

Arianna R Means, David E Phillips, Grégoire Lurton, Anne Njoroge, Sabine M Furere, Rong Liu, Wisal M Hassan, Xiaochen Dai, Orvalho Augusto, Peter Cherutich and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arianna R MeansDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; aerubin@uw.edu.
David E PhillipsDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Grégoire LurtonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anne NjorogeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sabine M FurereDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rong LiuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wisal M HassanDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Xiaochen DaiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Orvalho AugustoDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peter CherutichDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gloria IkileziDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Caroline SoiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dong XuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher G KempDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bridging the 'know-do gap' is an enormous challenge for global health practitioners. They must be able to understand local health dynamics within the operational and social contexts that engender them, test and adjust approaches to implementation in collaboration with communities and stakeholders, interpret data to inform policy decisions, and design adaptive and resilient health systems at scale. These skills and methods have been formalized within the nascent field of Implementation Science (IS). As graduates of the world's first PhD program dedicated explicitly to IS, we have a unique perspective on the value of IS and the training, knowledge, and skills essential to bridging the 'know-do gap'. In this article, we describe the philosophy and curricula at the core of our program, outline the methods vital to IS in a global health context, and detail the role that we believe IS will increasingly play in global health practice. At this junction of enormous challenges and opportunities, we believe that IS offers the necessary tools for global health professionals to address complex problems in context and raises the bar of success for the global health programs of the future.

Indexed as

curriculumeducationglobal healthimplementation sciencetraining

Identifiers

PMID27846928
PMCPMC5110555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.