Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846872›Full record

ReviewBMC pulmonary medicine2016

Challenges on non-invasive ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure in the elderly.

Raffaele Scala

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06257667 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment on Carbon Dioxide-levels in COPD- Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Using Either OptiflowTM or Optiflow+DuetTM Nasal Cannula), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06257667 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effect of High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment on Carbon Dioxide-levels in COPD- Patients With Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Using Either OptiflowTM or Optiflow+DuetTM Nasal Cannula

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled138ConditionsHypercapnic Respiratory Failure, COPDArmsRespiratory Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: which recipe for success?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2018
    Review
  18. Highlights in acute respiratory failure.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raffaele ScalaPulmonology and RICU, S. Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy. raffaele_scala@hotmail.com.
Ospedale San Donato · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure is a frequent complication in elderly patients especially if suffering from chronic cardio-pulmonary diseases. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation constitutes a successful therapeutic tool in the elderly as, like in younger patients, it is able to prevent endotracheal intubation in a wide range of acute conditions; moreover, this ventilator technique is largely applied in the elderly in whom invasive mechanical ventilation is considered not appropriated. Furthermore, the integration of new technological devices, ethical issues and environment of treatment are still largely debated in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in the elderly.This review aims at reporting and critically analyzing the peculiarities in the management of acute respiratory failure in elderly people, the role of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, the potential advantages of applying alternative or integrated therapeutic tools (i.e. high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, non-invasive and invasive cough assist devices and low-flow carbon-dioxide extracorporeal systems), drawbacks in physician's communication and "end of life" decisions. As several areas of this topic are not supported by evidence-based data, this report takes in account also "real-life" data as well as author's experience.The choice of the setting and of the timing of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in elderly people with advanced cardiopulmonary disease should be carefully evaluated together with the chance of using integrated or alternative supportive devices. Last but not least, economic and ethical issues may often challenges the behavior of the physicians towards elderly people who are hospitalized for acute respiratory failure at the end stage of their cardiopulmonary and neoplastic diseases.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedBronchoscopyCannulaFrail ElderlyHumansIntubation, IntratrachealNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyTerminal CareAcute respiratory failureBronchoscopyCO2-removalElderly patientEnd-of-lifeEndotracheal intubationHigh-flow nasal cannulaNon-invasive mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID27846872
PMCPMC5111281
OpenAlexW2549766511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.