Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846857›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2016

Uptake of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Kenya: testing the health belief model through pathway modeling on cohort data.

Heleen Vermandere, Marie-Anne van Stam, Violet Naanyu, Kristien Michielsen, Olivier Degomme, Frans Oort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heleen VermandereInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, ingang 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. heleen.vermandere@ugent.be.
Marie-Anne van StamUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Violet NaanyuDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Kristien MichielsenInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, ingang 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier DegommeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, ingang 75, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Frans OortDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies investigate HPV vaccine acceptability, applying health behavior theories to identify determinants; few include real uptake, the final variable of interest. This study investigated the utility of the Health Belief Model (HBM) in predicting HPV vaccine uptake in Kenya, focusing on the importance of promotion, probing willingness to vaccinate as precursor of uptake and exploring the added value of personal characteristics.

methodsLongitudinal data were collected before and after a pilot HPV vaccination program in Eldoret among mothers of eligible girls (N = 255). Through pathway modeling, associations between vaccine uptake and the HBM constructs, willingness to vaccinate and adequate promotion were examined. Adequate promotion was defined as a personal evaluation of promotional information received. Finally, baseline cervical cancer awareness and socio-demographic variables were added to the model verifying their direct, mediating or moderating effects on the predictive value of the HBM.

resultsPerceiving yourself as adequately informed at follow-up was the strongest determinant of vaccine uptake. HBM constructs (susceptibility, self-efficacy and foreseeing father's refusal as barrier) only influenced willingness to vaccinate, which was not correlated with vaccination. Baseline awareness of cervical cancer predicted uptake.

conclusionsThe association between adequate promotion and vaccination reveals the importance of triggers beyond personal control. Adoption of new health behaviors might be more determined by organizational variables, such as promotion, than by prior personal beliefs. Assessing users' and non-users' perspectives during and after implementing a vaccination program can help identifying stronger determinants of vaccination behavior.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAttitude to HealthCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaLongitudinal StudiesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus VaccinesCohortHealth Belief ModelHPV vaccinationKenyaPathway modeling

Identifiers

PMID27846857
PMCPMC5111174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.