Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846824›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

Birgit S van Zwicht, Matty R Crone, Jan M M van Lith, Marlies E B Rijnders

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birgit S van ZwichtDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. b.s.van_zwicht@lumc.nl.
Matty R CroneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan M M van LithDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marlies E B RijndersDepartment of Child Health TNO, PO Box 2215, 2301, CE, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Biophysical properties and role of CLIC6 in cardiomyocyte mitochondriaR03TR004178 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SINGH, HARPREET · 2022 to 2022
$158k
NCATS NIH HHS R03 TR004178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCenteringPregnancy (CP) is a multifaceted group based care-model integrated in routine prenatal care, combining health assessment, education, and support. CP has shown some positive results on perinatal outcomes. However, the effects are less obvious when limited to the results of randomized controlled trials: as there are few trials and there is a variation in reported outcomes. Furthermore, former research was mostly conducted in the United States of America and in specific (often high risk) populations. Our study aims to evaluate the effects of CP in the Netherlands in a general population of pregnant women (low and high risk). Furthermore we aim to explore the mechanisms leading to the eventual effects by measuring potential mediating factors.

designWe will perform a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial, in a Western region in the Netherlands. Inclusion criteria are <24 weeks of gestation and able to communicate in Dutch (with assistance). Women in the control period will receive individual care, women in the intervention period (starting at the randomized time-point) will be offered the choice between individual care or CP. Primary outcomes are maternal and neonatal morbidity, retrieved from a national routine database. Secondary outcomes are health behavior, psychosocial outcomes, satisfaction, health care utilization and process outcomes, collected through self-administered questionnaires, group-evaluations and individual interviews. We will conduct intention-to-treat analyses. Also a per protocol analysis will be performed comparing the three subgroups: control group, CP-participants and non-CP-participants, using multilevel techniques to account for clustering effects. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the evidence regarding the effect of CP and gives a first indication of the effect and implementation of CP in both low and high-risk pregnancies in a high-income Western society other than the USA. Also, measuring factors that are hypothesized to mediate the effect of CP will enable to explain the mechanisms that lead to effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register, NTR4178 , registered September 17

Indexed as

Group ProcessesOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdultClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansNetherlandsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareRisk AssessmentCenteringPregnancyGroup CareGroup Prenatal CareGroup ProcessesHealth BehaviorInfant, NewbornPatient EducationPatient SatisfactionPregnancy OutcomePrenatal care/methods

Identifiers

PMID27846824
PMCPMC5111184
OpenAlexW2552199004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.