Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846815›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2016

Endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral access - still safe and valuable diagnostic tool.

Sylwia Sławek, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Agnieszka Gaczkowska, Justyna Koszarska, Damian Celiński, Marek Grygier, Maciej Lesiak, Stefan Grajek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Myocarditis: A Clinical Overview.Current cardiology reports · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylwia SławekDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. sylwiaslawek89@gmail.com.
Aleksander AraszkiewiczDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Agnieszka GaczkowskaDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Justyna KoszarskaDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Damian CelińskiDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Marek GrygierDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Maciej LesiakDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Stefan GrajekDepartment of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endomyocardial biopsy has proven to be an integral diagnostic tool for surveillance of cardiac allograft rejection and identification of myocardial diseases. Nevertheless, this invasive procedure is not risk-free. This study focuses on the risk of complications and diagnostic performance of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB).

methodsIn this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 315 EMB procedures performed between July 2008 and May 2015 in 73 patients. All EMBs were made via the right femoral vein approach under fluoroscopic control to evaluate suspected myocarditis, unclear heart failure, unexplained cardiomyopathy, assumed infiltrative and storage disease or as a part of routine allograft rejection monitoring and clinically suspected rejection diagnosis after heart transplantation (HTx). Obtained specimens were diagnosed histopathologically by one experienced pathologist. All patients underwent a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG monitoring, transthoracic echocardiography before and after EMB to obtain a detailed assessment of the incidence of heart rhythm disorders, pericardial effusions or worsening valve insufficiency. Complications resulting from the procedure were classified as major or minor according to the risk of death.

resultsAmong all the 315 biopsies, 86.67% were performed in 32 patients after HTx, 3.81% in patients with myocarditis, 2.54% in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and 1.9% in patients with amyloidosis. The overall complications rate was 1.9% (6 of 315 procedures). Major complications included perforation with pericardial tamponade requiring surgical intervention (0.64%, 2 of 315 procedures). Minor complications included: pericardial effusion (0.32%, 1 of 315 procedures), local hematoma (0.64%, 2 of 315 procedures) and right coronary artery-right ventricle fistula in HTx recipient (0.32%, 1 of 315 procedures).

conclusionsEMB is a safe procedure with low risk of serious complications and high effectiveness for the evaluation of unexplained left ventricle dysfunction and monitoring allograft rejection after HTx.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCardiac CatheterizationCardiomyopathiesElectrocardiographyFemaleFemoral VeinFluoroscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumReproducibility of ResultsComplicationsEndomyocardial biopsyHeart transplantationMyocarditisPericardial tamponade

Identifiers

PMID27846815
PMCPMC5111178
OpenAlexW2552974280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.