ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in China: Projected possibility of scale-up from the current domestic option.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare resource utilization and caregiver burden associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis hospitalizations in Taiwan.BMC pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Health impact of rotavirus vaccination in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis measuring the total costs against the health benefits of three different rotavirus vaccines for Mexico.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in China: Comparison between private market provision and national immunization programs.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in China: Projected possibility of scale-up from the current domestic option.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Improving rotavirus vaccine coverage: Can newer-generation and locally produced vaccines help?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotavirus infection causes considerable disease burden of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalization and death among children less than 5 years in China. Although two rotavirus vaccines (Rotarix and RotaTeq) have been licensed in more than 100 countries in the world, the Lanzhou Lamb rotavirus vaccine (LLR) is the only vaccine licensed in China. This study aims to forecast the potential impacts of the two international vaccines compared to domestic LLR.
methodsAn economic evaluation was performed using a Markov simulation model. We compared costs at the societal aspect and health impacts with and without a vaccination program by LLR, Rotarix or RotaTeq. Parameters including demographic, epidemiological data, costs and efficacy of vaccines were obtained from literature review. The model incorporated the impact of vaccination on reduction of incidence of rotavirus infection and severity of AGE indicated by hospitalization, inpatient visits and deaths. Outcomes are presented in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to status quo.
resultsIn a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 infants, the two international vaccines showed very good cost-effectiveness, with ICER of Rotateq and Rotarix shifting from LLR of $1715.11/QALY and $2105.66/QALY, respectively. Rotateq and Rotarix had significantly decreased incidence compared to LLR, particularly among infants aged 6 months to 2 years.
conclusionsRotaTeq is expected to introduce in the national routine immunization program to reduce disease burden of rotavirus infection with universal coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.