Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846246›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials to Ascertain Fatal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events Attributable to Preventive Low-Dose Aspirin: No Evidence of Increased Risk.

Peter C Elwood, Gareth Morgan, Julieta Galante, John W K Chia, Sunil Dolwani, J Michael Graziano, Mark Kelson, Angel Lanas, Marcus Longley, Ceri J Phillips and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter C ElwoodCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Gareth MorganCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Julieta GalanteCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
John W K ChiaDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Sunil DolwaniInstitute of Cancer & Genetics Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Michael GrazianoHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Mark KelsonCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Angel LanasUniversity Clinic Hospital, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, CIBEReshd, Zaragoza, Spain.
Marcus LongleyWelsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Ceri J PhillipsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Janet PickeringCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Stephen E RobertsMedical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Swee S SoonDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Will StewardDepartment of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Delyth MorrisUniversity Library Services, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Alison L WeightmanCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Cardiff University · GBCochrane · GBSwansea University · GBHarvard University · USHywel Dda University Health Board · GBNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspirin has been shown to lower the incidence and the mortality of vascular disease and cancer but its wider adoption appears to be seriously impeded by concerns about gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Unlike heart attacks, stroke and cancer, GI bleeding is an acute event, usually followed by complete recovery. We propose therefore that a more appropriate evaluation of the risk-benefit balance would be based on fatal adverse events, rather than on the incidence of bleeding. We therefore present a literature search and meta-analysis to ascertain fatal events attributable to low-dose aspirin.

methodsIn a systematic literature review we identified reports of randomised controlled trials of aspirin in which both total GI bleeding events and bleeds that led to death had been reported. Principal investigators of studies in which fatal events had not been adequately described were contacted via email and asked for further details. A meta-analyses was then performed to estimate the risk of fatal gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to low-dose aspirin.

resultsEleven randomised trials were identified in the literature search. In these the relative risk (RR) of 'major' incident GI bleeding in subjects who had been randomised to low-dose aspirin was 1.55 (95% CI 1.33, 1.83), and the risk of a bleed attributable to aspirin being fatal was 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.80). In all the subjects randomised to aspirin, compared with those randomised not to receive aspirin, there was no significant increase in the risk of a fatal bleed (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41, 1.43).

conclusionsThe majority of the adverse events caused by aspirin are GI bleeds, and there appears to be no valid evidence that the overall frequency of fatal GI bleeds is increased by aspirin. The substantive risk for prophylactic aspirin is therefore cerebral haemorrhage which can be fatal or severely disabling, with an estimated risk of one death and one disabling stroke for every 1,000 people taking aspirin for ten years. These adverse effects of aspirin should be weighed against the reductions in vascular disease and cancer.

Indexed as

AspirinDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMyocardial InfarctionNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeAspirin

Identifiers

PMID27846246
PMCPMC5113022
OpenAlexW2555965478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.