Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27846212›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Quantifying Differences and Similarities in Whole-Brain White Matter Architecture Using Local Connectome Fingerprints.

Fang-Cheng Yeh, Jean M Vettel, Aarti Singh, Barnabas Poczos, Scott T Grafton, Kirk I Erickson, Wen-Yih I Tseng, Timothy D Verstynen

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural pathways underlying the production of pitch and rhythm in aphasia.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang-Cheng YehDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-2173
Jean M VettelU.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-2986
Aarti SinghDepartment of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Barnabas PoczosDepartment of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Scott T GraftonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4015-3151
Kirk I EricksonDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania United States of America.
Wen-Yih I TsengInstitute of Medical Device and Imaging and Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Timothy D VerstynenDepartment of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Influence of Physical Activity and Weight Loss on Brain PlasticityR01DK095172 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ERICKSON, KIRK I · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095172NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying differences or similarities in connectomes has been a challenge due to the immense complexity of global brain networks. Here we introduce a noninvasive method that uses diffusion MRI to characterize whole-brain white matter architecture as a single local connectome fingerprint that allows for a direct comparison between structural connectomes. In four independently acquired data sets with repeated scans (total N = 213), we show that the local connectome fingerprint is highly specific to an individual, allowing for an accurate self-versus-others classification that achieved 100% accuracy across 17,398 identification tests. The estimated classification error was approximately one thousand times smaller than fingerprints derived from diffusivity-based measures or region-to-region connectivity patterns for repeat scans acquired within 3 months. The local connectome fingerprint also revealed neuroplasticity within an individual reflected as a decreasing trend in self-similarity across time, whereas this change was not observed in the diffusivity measures. Moreover, the local connectome fingerprint can be used as a phenotypic marker, revealing 12.51% similarity between monozygotic twins, 5.14% between dizygotic twins, and 4.51% between none-twin siblings, relative to differences between unrelated subjects. This novel approach opens a new door for probing the influence of pathological, genetic, social, or environmental factors on the unique configuration of the human connectome.

Indexed as

Subtraction TechniqueAdultAlgorithmsBrainConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityWhite MatterYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27846212
PMCPMC5112901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.