Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27845567›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2018

SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications.

Michael Ljungberg, P Hendrik Pretorius

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation byThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Technological Advances in SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael Ljungberg1 Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
P Hendrik Pretorius2 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Lund University · SEUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Probing Dose Limits in Cardiac SPECT with Reconstruction and Personalized ImagingR01HL122484 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KING, MICHAEL A, WERNICK, MILES N · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional nuclear medicine imaging with single-photon emission CT (SPECT) in combination with anatomical CT has been commercially available since the beginning of this century. The combination of the two modalities has improved both the sensitivity and specificity of many clinical applications and CT in conjunction with SPECT that allows for spatial overlay of the SPECT data on good anatomy images. Introduction of diagnostic CT units as part of the SPECT/CT system has also potentially allowed for a more cost-efficient use of the equipment. Most of the SPECT systems available are based on the well-known Anger camera principle with NaI(Tl) as a scintillation material, parallel-hole collimators and multiple photomultiplier tubes, which, from the centroid of the scintillation light, determine the position of an event. Recently, solid-state detectors using cadmium-zinc-telluride became available and clinical SPECT cameras employing multiple pinhole collimators have been developed and introduced in the market. However, even if new systems become available with better hardware, the SPECT reconstruction will still be affected by photon attenuation and scatter and collimator response. Compensation for these effects is needed even for qualitative studies to avoid artefacts leading to false positives. This review highlights the recent progress for both new SPECT cameras systems as well as for various data-processing and compensation methods.

Indexed as

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone NeoplasmsCadmiumHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMultimodal ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingParathyroid NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation DosageTelluriumZincCadmiumCdZnTeTelluriumZinc

Identifiers

PMID27845567
PMCPMC5966195
OpenAlexW2552627117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.