Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27845361›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis mutants suggests a crosstalk between ABA, ethylene and GSH against combined cold and osmotic stress.

Deepak Kumar, Saptarshi Hazra, Riddhi Datta, Sharmila Chattopadhyay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular and Physiological Responses of Plants that Enhance Cold Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Metatranscriptomic Analyses Reveal the Functional Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepak KumarPlant Biology Laboratory, Organic &Medicinal Chemistry Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India.
Saptarshi HazraPlant Biology Laboratory, Organic &Medicinal Chemistry Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India.
Riddhi DattaPlant Biology Laboratory, Organic &Medicinal Chemistry Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India.
Sharmila ChattopadhyayPlant Biology Laboratory, Organic &Medicinal Chemistry Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India.
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The involvement of ethylene and abscisic acid in providing stress tolerance and defence response to plants is widely recognized. However, little is known about the cross-talk between glutathione with ethylene and abscisic acid to combat stress in planta. Here, transcriptome analysis of combined cold and osmotic stress treated Arabidopsis mutants were carried out to elucidate the crosstalk between the abscisic acid, ethylene and glutathione. Microarray experiment revealed the differential regulation of about 2313 and 4131 transcripts in ein2 (ethylene insensitive mutant) and aba1.6 (abscisic acid mutant) respectively. Functional analysis exposed common down-regulated stress and defence, secondary metabolite biosynthesis viz. phenylpropanoid, lignin and flavonols, redox and transcription factors related genes in ein2, aba1.6 and pad2.1 (glutathione mutant) in response to combined stress treatment. The reduced glutathione content was less in stress treated mutants in comparison to Col-0. Again, selective down-regulated transcripts in stress treated mutants were noted up-regulated after glutathione feeding. Some of the important differentially expressed genes were also validated by comparative proteomics analysis of stress treated mutants. In summary, our results suggested the role of ethylene and abscisic acid in inducing stress-responsive genes and proteins by activating glutathione biosynthesis to combat abiotic stress conditions in plant system.

Indexed as

MutationAbscisic AcidArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCold TemperatureEthylenesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlutathioneOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOsmotic PressureStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptional ActivationAbscisic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsEthylenesGlutathione

Identifiers

PMID27845361
PMCPMC5109278
OpenAlexW2556175901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.