Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27845358›Full record

GuidelineSpinal cord2017

Recommendations for the National Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke spinal cord injury common data elements for children and youth with SCI.

M J Mulcahey, L C Vogel, M Sheikh, J C Arango-Lasprilla, M Augutis, E Garner, E M Hagen, L B Jakeman, E Kelly, R Martin and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Spinal cord, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design and Rationale for Common Data Elements for Clinical Research in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

M J MulcaheyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
L C VogelShriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL, USA.
M SheikhThe Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA.
J C Arango-LasprillaBioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Foundation for Science, Bizkaia, Spain.
M AugutisKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
E GarnerAustin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
E M HagenRegional Hospital of Viborg, Viborg, Denmark.
L B JakemanNIH/NINDS Neuroscience Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
E KellyShriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL, USA.
R MartinKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J OdenkirchenNIH/NINDS Neuroscience Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
A Scheel-SailerSwiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland.
J SchottlerShriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL, USA.
H TaylorTIRR Memorial Hermann Rehabilitation and Research & University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
C C ThielenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
K ZebrackiShriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Chicago · USNational Institutes of Health · USThomas Jefferson University · USAustin Health · AUBioCruces Health research Institute · ESEmmes (United States) · USKarolinska Institutet · SEKennedy Krieger Institute · USMemorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation · USRegionshospitalet Viborg · DKSwiss Paraplegic Center · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designIn 2014, the adult spinal cord injury (SCI) common data element (CDE) recommendations were made available. This project was a review of the adult SCI CDE for relevance to children and youth with SCI.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to review the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) adult SCI CDEs for relevance to children and youth with SCI.

settingInternational.

methodsThe pediatric working group consisted of international members with varied fields of expertise related to pediatric SCI. The group convened biweekly meetings for 6 months in 2015. All of the adult SCI CDEs were reviewed, evaluated and modified/created for four age groups: 0-5 years, 6-12 years, 13-15 years and 16-18 years. Whenever possible, results of published research studies were used to guide recommendations. In the absence of empirical support, grey literature and international content expert consensus were garnered. Existing pediatric NINDS CDEs and new CDEs were developed in areas where adult recommendations were not appropriate. After internal working group review of domain recommendations, these pediatric CDEs were vetted during a public review from November through December 2015.

resultsVersion 1.0 of the pediatric SCI CDEs was posted in February 2016.

conclusionThe pediatric SCI CDEs are incorporated directly into the NINDS SCI CDE sets and can be found at https://commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov.

Indexed as

Common Data ElementsSpinal Cord InjuriesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.)United States

Identifiers

PMID27845358
OpenAlexW2557191317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.