Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27844449›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2016

Estimation of activity of administered

Kenta Sakaguchi, Makoto Hosono, Tomomi Imamura, Naomi Takahara, Misa Hayashi, Yuko Yakushiji, Kazunari Ishii, Tatsuro Uto, Takamichi Murakami

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenta SakaguchiDivision of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto HosonoDivision of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Osaka, Japan. hosono@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Tomomi ImamuraDivision of Nursing, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Naomi TakaharaDivision of Nursing, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Misa HayashiDivision of Nursing, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Yuko YakushijiDivision of Nursing, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Kazunari IshiiDivision of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuro UtoDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Takamichi MurakamiDivision of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University · JPKindai University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) with

resultsWhen entering independent variables, the cubic regression equation could be used to estimate an administered dosage with an accuracy of ±10 % for 62 % of all patients and ±20 % for 90 % of all patients.

conclusionsWe conclude that this method is useful for estimating the administered dosage from the dose equivalent rate on the temporal region of the head.

Identifiers

PMID27844449
PMCPMC5108740
OpenAlexW2556235497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.