ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2016
Surface anatomical landmarks for the location of posterior sacral foramina in sacral nerve stimulation.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Measurement of S1 foramen depth for ultrasound-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection.The Korean journal of pain · 2023Article
- Postoperative Pain Relief With Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Sacral Foramen Block for Foot and Ankle Surgeries.Cureus · 2022Article
- Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Variation in bony landmarks and predictors of success with sacral neuromodulation.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSacral nerve stimulation is a common treatment for various pelvic floor disorders. It consists of the percutaneous introduction of electrodes through the posterior sacral foramina for therapeutic stimulation of the target sacral spinal nerve. The aim of our study was to determine the surface anatomical landmarks of the sacrum to facilitate identification of the posterior sacral foramina.
methodsThis study was conducted on 20 human cadavers. The cadavers were placed in a prone position, and all the soft tissues of the sacral region were removed to allow exposure of the osseous structures. Different measurements were taken in relation to the posterior sacral foramina, the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the median sacral crest (MSC). A median coefficient of variation (CV) was determined.
resultsThe diameter of the second sacral foramen showed the greatest variability. The distances between each individual foramen and the MSC had an acceptable variability (CV < 20%). In contrast, the distance between foramina had a high variability. The distance between PSIS and the second posterior sacral foramen was also found to have an acceptable variability (CV < 20%). However, the angle formed by an horizontal line between PSIS and a line between PSIS and S2 foramina had high variability.
conclusionsWe found that the distance between sacral foramina and MSC is relatively constant while the distance between foramina and the relations between foramina and PSIS is highly variable. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy may facilitate electrode placement and is complementary to the regular use of fluoroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27844258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.