ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017
Quantification of the focal progression of coronary atherosclerosis through automated co-registration of virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound imaging data.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated finite element approach to generate anatomical patient-specific biomechanical models of atherosclerotic arteries from virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Ultrasound capsule endoscopy: sounding out the future.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel algorithm that circumferentially co-registers serial virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) data for the focal assessment of coronary atherosclerosis progression. Thirty-three patients with an abnormal non-invasive cardiac stress test or stable angina underwent baseline and follow-up (6 or 12 months) invasive evaluation that included acquisition of VH-IVUS image data. Baseline and follow-up image pairs (n = 4194) were automatically co-registered in the circumferential direction via a multi-variate cross-correlation algorithm. Algorithm stability and accuracy were assessed by comparing results from multiple iterations of the algorithm (iteration 1 vs. iteration 2) and against values determined manually by two expert VH-IVUS readers (algorithm vs. two expert readers). Furthermore, focal plaque progression values were compared between the algorithm and expert readers following co-registration by the independently determined angles. Strong agreement in circumferential co-registration angles were observed across multiple iterations of the algorithm (stability) and between the algorithm and expert readers (accuracy; all concordance correlation coefficients >0.98). Furthermore, circumferential co-registration angles determined by the algorithm were not statistically when compared to values determined by two expert readers (p = 0. 99). Bland-Altman analysis indicated minimal bias when comparing focal VH-IVUS defined plaque progression in corresponding sectors following circumferential co-registration between the algorithm and expert readers. Finally, average differences in changes in total plaque and constituent areas between the algorithm and readers were within the average range of difference between readers (interobserver variability). We present a stable and validated algorithm to automatically circumferentially co-register serial VH-IVUS imaging data for the focal quantification of coronary atherosclerosis progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27844239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.