ReviewHerz2017
[Clinical importance of HDL cholesterol].
Review in Herz, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Theobromine Supplementation on HDL-c Subclasses (HDL-c2, HDL-c3), HDL-c2/HDL-c3 Ratio, and Gene Expression of PPAR-α and Sirt1 in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a predictor of reduced heart rate variability in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- [Laboratory diagnostics of lipid metabolism disorders].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023Article
- Prevalence of High HDL Cholesterol and Its Associated Factors Among Tunisian Women of Childbearing Age: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Walking activity during ambulant cardiac rehabilitation is related to maximum working capacity, age, and smoking behavior.Vascular health and risk management · 2018Article
- HDL cholesterol: reappraisal of its clinical relevance.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backroundEach year 16-17 million determinations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are conducted and interpreted in Germany. Recently acquired data have led to a fundamental reassessment of the clinical significance of HDL-C.
methodThis review article is based on a selective literature search.
resultsLow HDL‑C levels usually indicate an increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in primary prevention but the epidemiological relationship between HDL‑C and the risk is complex. The HDL plays a role in the back transport and excretion of cholesterol; however, the biological functions of HDL are dependent on the protein and lipid composition, which is not reflected by the HDL‑C concentration. If the composition of HDL is pathologically altered it can also exert negative vascular effects.
conclusionCompared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL‑C is of secondary importance for cardiovascular risk stratification and the calculation of the LDL-C:HDL‑C ratio is not useful for all patients. Low HDL‑C levels should prompt a search for additional metabolic and inflammatory pathologies. An increase in HDL‑C through lifestyle changes (e.g. smoking cessation and physical exercise) has positive effects and is recommended; however, HDL‑C is currently not a valid target for drug therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.