Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843847›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care

Peri-conceptional supplementation of folic acid-knowledge and practices of pregnant women and health providers.

Vartika Saxena, Manisha Naithani, Ranjeeta Kumari, Richa Singh, Pranoti Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution.

Vartika SaxenaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Manisha NaithaniDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Ranjeeta KumariDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Richa SinghDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Pranoti DasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SRH University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextNeural tube defects (NTDs) are one of the most common congenital anomalies. NTDs are preventable if folic acid (FA) is supplemented before and during conception. Knowledge and supplementation of FA by pregnant women as well as it's timely provision by health providers is crucial in reducing the burden of NTDs in the community.

aimTo study the knowledge and supplementation of FA by pregnant women and it's prescription/provision by health providers. SETTINGS AND

designA cross-sectional study was conducted in the block Doiwala, District Dehradun, Uttarakhand. SUBJECTS AND

methodsA total of 400 pregnant women and 121 government health providers (5 medical officers, 25 auxiliary nurse midwives [ANMs], and 91 accredited social health activists [ASHAs]) were interviewed on predesigned, pretested questionnaire by study/field investigator. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Proportion of different variables calculated and Chi-square test with Yates correction was applied.

resultsOf 400, 73.50% of women had heard of FA. Overall, knowledge scores suggested intermediate to low level of knowledge about FA. Totally 94.25% of women had planned pregnancies; however, only 4.75% of women reported FA supplementation before conception. This indicates that if these women would have been properly counseled and prescribed FA, they might have taken it. About 60% of medical officers, 4% of ANMs, and 3.3% of ASHAs knew FA deficiency as one of the causes of NTD. None of the health providers reported to be prescribing/counseling FA to pregnant women. FA was out of supply on the block at the time of the study.

conclusionsKnowledge and supplementation practices related with FA are poor.

Indexed as

Folic acid supplementationhealth providerpregnant women

Identifiers

PMID27843847
PMCPMC5084567
OpenAlexW2533137258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.