Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843774›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2016

Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Headache and Complication Prevention.

Linqiu Zhou, Avi Ashkenazi, Joseph W Smith, Na Jen, Timothy R Deer, Chen Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peripheral Neuromodulation for the Management of Headache.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linqiu ZhouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Avi AshkenaziDoylestown Hospital, Doylestown, PA, USA.
Joseph W SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Na JenMercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Mercy Health System, Darby, PA, USA.
Timothy R DeerThe Center for Pain Relief, Charleston, WV, USA.
Chen ZhouJefferson Medical School, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USDoylestown Hospital · USMercy Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has emerged as a useful tool in the treatment of intractable headaches. However, complications such as skin erosion, infection and lead migration have adversely affected clinical outcome, and occasionally led to treatment cessation.

objectivesHere we report the results of peripheral nerve stimulator implantation performed on 24 patients with various chronic headaches at our center over a period of 9 years. We describe the complications of the procedure and their prevention with a modified surgical technique. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe searched our database for patients with chronic refractory headaches who had undergone PNS. Patients were assessed before being considered for PNS, and their pain characteristics were reviewed. Following a successful trial, patients were implanted with a permanent peripheral nerve stimulator. Selection of target nerves was based on headache diagnosis and head pain characteristics. Patients were followed for an average of 4.9 years. Headache characteristics before and after treatment were compared.

resultsTwenty four patients were included in the study. All patients reported on improvement in head pain intensity, duration and frequency three months after permanent device implantation Mean total pain index (TPI) decreased significantly, from 516 ± 131 before the procedure to 74.8 ± 61.6 at the last follow up (P < 0.00001). There were no acute post-operative infections. Three patients had their stimulator removed. The self-rated treatment satisfaction was excellent in 54% of the patients, very good or good in 42%, and fair in 4%.

conclusionsOur results support the use of PNS in some patients with refractory chronic headaches. Appropriate surgical planning and technique are important to achieve good clinical outcome and to minimize complications.

Indexed as

Auriculotemporal NerveComplicationCranial NervesHeadacheOccipital NervePeripheral Nerve StimulationSupraorbital Nerve

Identifiers

PMID27843774
PMCPMC5100003
OpenAlexW2462276801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.