Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843709›Full record

ArticleBioResearch open access2016

A Computational Model of Cellular Engraftment on Lung Scaffolds.

Joshua J Pothen, Vignesh Rajendran, Darcy Wagner, Daniel J Weiss, Bradford J Smith, Baoshun Ma, Jason H T Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioResearch open access, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua J PothenUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.
Vignesh RajendranUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.
Darcy WagnerComprehensive Pneumology Center , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Universitätsklinikum Grosshadern, und Helmholtz Zentrum München, München, Germany .
Daniel J WeissUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.
Bradford J SmithUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.
Baoshun MaUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.
Jason H T BatesUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington, Vermont.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The possibility that stem cells might be used to regenerate tissue is now being investigated for a variety of organs, but these investigations are still essentially exploratory and have few predictive tools available to guide experimentation. We propose, in this study, that the field of lung tissue regeneration might be better served by predictive tools that treat stem cells as agents that obey certain rules of behavior governed by both their phenotype and their environment. Sufficient knowledge of these rules of behavior would then, in principle, allow lung tissue development to be simulated computationally. Toward this end, we developed a simple agent-based computational model to simulate geographic patterns of cells seeded onto a lung scaffold. Comparison of the simulated patterns to those observed experimentally supports the hypothesis that mesenchymal stem cells proliferate preferentially toward the scaffold boundary, whereas alveolar epithelial cells do not. This demonstrates that a computational model of this type has the potential to assist in the discovery of rules of cellular behavior.

Indexed as

agent-based modelimage processinglung scaffoldstem cells

Identifiers

PMID27843709
PMCPMC5107660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.