Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843626›Full record

ArticleESMO open2016

Tumour and cellular distribution of activated forms of PR in breast cancers: a novel immunohistochemical analysis of a large clinical cohort.

Jacques Bonneterre, Jacques Bosq, Philippe Jamme, Alexander Valent, Erard M Gilles, Alexander A Zukiwski, Suzanne A W Fuqua, Carol A Lange, Joyce O'Shaughnessy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Isoform specificity of progesterone receptor antibodies.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques BonneterreCentre Oscar-Lambret, Université Lille Nord de France , Lille , France.
Jacques BosqInstitut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France.
Philippe JammeCentre Oscar-Lambret, Université Lille Nord de France , Lille , France.
Alexander ValentInstitut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France.
Erard M GillesInvivis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA; Arno Therapeutics, Flemington, New Jersey, USA.
Alexander A ZukiwskiArno Therapeutics , Flemington, New Jersey , USA.
Suzanne A W FuquaBaylor College of Medicine , Houston, Texas , USA.
Carol A LangeUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center , Minneapolis, Minnesota , USA.
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology , Dallas, Texas , USA.
Arno Therapeutics (United States) · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRBaylor College of Medicine · USTexas Oncology · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe progesterone receptor (PR) is expressed by ∼70% of early breast tumours and is implicated in the progression of breast cancer. In cancerous tissues PR may be activated in the absence of a ligand, or when ligand concentrations are very low, resulting in aberrantly activated PR (APR). The presence of APR may indicate that patients with breast cancer are more likely to respond to antiprogestins. The aims of this study were to describe and classify the histological subnuclear morphology of active and inactive PR in archival breast cancer samples.

methodsArchived tumour specimens from 801 women with invasive breast cancer were collected. Tissue samples (n=789) were analysed for PR isoforms A and B (PRA and PRB), Ki67 and estrogen receptors (ERα) status, using immunohistochemistry. Medical records were used to determine human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status, tumour stage and grade.

resultsA total of 79% of tumours stained positive for either PRA or PRB, and of these 25% of PRA-positive and 23% of PRB-positive tumours had PR present in the activated form. APRA was associated with higher tumour grade (p=0.001). APRB was associated with a higher tumour grade (p=0.046) and a trend for a more advanced stage. Patients with PR-positive tumours treated with antiestrogens had better disease-free survival (DFS) than those with PR-negative tumours (p<0.0001). Cumulative progression rate and DFS were similar irrespective of APR status. Both APRA and APRB were independent of HER2, ERα and Ki67 expression.

conclusionsAPR had a binary mode of expression in the breast cancer specimens tested, allowing separation into two tumour subsets. APR is an independent target at the cellular and tumour level and may therefore be a suitable predictive marker for antiprogestins, such as onapristone. Using the described technique, a companion diagnostic is under development to identify APR in solid tumours.

Indexed as

activatedbreast canceronapristoneprogesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID27843626
PMCPMC5070234
OpenAlexW2528752659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.