Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843622›Full record

ReviewESMO open2016

Review of hormone-based treatments in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer focusing on aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant.

Iben Kümler, Ann S Knoop, Christina A R Jessing, Bent Ejlertsen, Dorte L Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 1-(Diarylmethyl)-1Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Relevance Function of Linc-ROR in the Pathogenesis of Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Growth of human breast cancers inDisease models & mechanisms · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Iben KümlerDepartment of Oncology , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Ann S KnoopDepartment of Oncology , Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Christina A R JessingDepartment of Oncology , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Bent EjlertsenDepartment of Oncology , Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Dorte L NielsenDepartment of Oncology , Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Herlev , Denmark.
Herlev Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndocrine therapy constitutes a central modality in the treatment of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the evidence for endocrine treatment in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer focusing on the aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane and fulvestrant.

methodsA review was carried out using PubMed. Randomised phase II and III trials reporting on ≥100 patients were included.

results35 trials met the inclusion criteria. If not used in the adjuvant setting, a non-steroid aromatase inhibitor was the optimal first-line option. In general, the efficacy of the different aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant was similar in tamoxifen-refractory patients. A randomised phase II trial of palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone showed significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with endocrine therapy alone in the first-line setting (20.2 vs 10.2 months). Furthermore, the addition of everolimus to exemestane in the Breast Cancer Trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) study resulted in an extension of median PFS by 4.5 months after recurrence/progression on a non-steroid aromatase inhibitor. However, overall survival was not significantly increased.

conclusionConventional treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant may be an adequate treatment option for most patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition might represent substantial advances for selected patients in some specific settings. However, there is an urgent need for prospective biomarker-driven trials to identify patients for whom these treatments are cost-effective.

Indexed as

Advanced breast cancer,Endocrine therapy

Identifiers

PMID27843622
PMCPMC5070302
OpenAlexW2526218544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.