Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843620›Full record

ReviewESMO open2016

Cancer clinical research in Latin America: current situation and opportunities. Expert opinion from the first ESMO workshop on clinical trials, Lima, 2015.

Christian Rolfo, Christian Caglevic, Denisse Bretel, David Hong, Luis E Raez, Andres F Cardona, Ana B Oton, Henry Gomez, Urania Dafni, Carlos Vallejos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Christian RolfoPhase I-Early Clinical Trials Unit , Antwerp University Hospital and Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Antwerp University , Edegem , Belgium.
Christian CaglevicMedical Oncology Department , Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez , Santiago , Chile.
Denisse BretelGrupo de Estudios Clinicos Oncologicos Peruano (GECOPERU) , Lima , Peru.
David HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas , USA.
Luis E RaezThoracic Oncology Program, Memorial Cancer Institute, Memorial Health Care System , Pembroke Pines, Florida , USA.
Andres F CardonaClinical and Translational Oncology Group , Institute of Oncology, Clínica del Country , Bogota , Colombia.
Ana B OtonMedical Oncology at Denver Health Care Medical Center and the University of Colorado Denver , Denver, Colorado , USA.
Henry GomezDivision of Medicine , National Cancer Institute (INEN) and Oncosalud , Lima , Peru.
Urania DafniBiostatistics Laboratory , School of Health Sciences, University of Athens and Frontier Science Foundation -Hellas , Athens , Greece.
Carlos VallejosAUNA Health System and Oncosalud , Lima , Peru.
Christoph ZielinskiClinical Division of Oncology and Department of Medicine I , Medical University Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Antwerp University Hospital · BECentro Peruano de Estudios Sociales · PEEsSALUD · PEFundación Arturo López Pérez · CLMedical University of Vienna · ATMemorial Health System · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latin America and the Caribbean have not yet developed strong clinical cancer research programmes. In order to improve this situation two international cancer organisations, the Latin American Society of Clinical Oncology (SLACOM) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) worked closely with the Peruvian Cooperative Oncology Group (GECOPERU) and organised a clinical cancer research workshop held in Lima, Peru, in October 2015. Many oncologists from different Latin American countries participated in this gathering. The opportunities for and strengths of clinical oncology research in Latin American and Caribbean countries were identified as the widespread use of the Spanish language, the high cancer burden, growing access to information, improving patient education, access to new drugs for research centres, regional networks and human resources. However, there are still many weaknesses and problems including the long timeline for regulatory approval, lack of economic investment, lack of training and lack of personnel participating in clinical research, lack of cancer registries, insufficient technology and insufficient supplies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, few cancer specialists, low general levels of education and the negative attitude of government authorities towards clinical research.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsDrug developmentLatin America

Identifiers

PMID27843620
PMCPMC5070258
OpenAlexW2464873326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.