Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843594›Full record

ArticleESMO open2016

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for prediction of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in early breast cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Michele Orditura, Gennaro Galizia, Anna Diana, Ciro Saccone, Luigi Cobellis, Jole Ventriglia, Francesco Iovino, Ciro Romano, Floriana Morgillo, Lavinia Mosca and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michele OrdituraDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Gennaro GaliziaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Anesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Anna DianaDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Ciro SacconeDivision of Breast Surgery, Medicina Futura Group, Naples, Napoli , Italy.
Luigi CobellisDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women, Children and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Jole VentrigliaDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Francesco IovinoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Anesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Ciro RomanoDivision of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Floriana MorgilloDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Lavinia MoscaDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women, Children and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Maria Rosaria DiademaDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Eva LietoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Anesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Eugenio ProcacciniBreast Unit , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Ferdinando De VitaDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDivision of Medical Oncology, 'F Magrassi-A Lanzara' Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery , Second University of Naples School of Medicine , Naples , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the correlation between presurgery neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with early breast cancer.

designRetrospective analysis.

participants300 Caucasian patients with early (T1-2, N0-1, non-metastatic) breast cancer who were followed from July 1999 to June 2015 at our Institution.

main outcome measuresDistant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

resultsOf whole populations (300 patients), 134 and 166 patients were grouped as low and high NLR, respectively, on the basis of NLR value of 1.97, as established by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under curve (AUC)=0.625, p=0.0160). The DMFS rates for 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 years were better in low NLR patients (100%, 98.9%, 91.7%, 82.7%, 82.7%, 82.7%, respectively), than in high NLR patients (99.4%, 94.3%, 84.5%, 69.2%, 66.0%, 51.4%, respectively), with a statistically significant association. On multivariate analysis, premenopausal status (HR=2.78, 95% CI 1.36 to 5.67, p=0.0049), N1 stage (HR=2.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.60, p=0.0167) and a high NLR value (HR=2.64, 95% CI 1.22 to 5.638, p=0.0133) were shown to be independent prognostic factors related to poor recurrence rate. To avoid risk of confounding bias, a propensity score-matched analysis was performed and multivariate analysis according to the Cox model confirmed premenopausal status (HR=2.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.93, p=0.0136), N1 stage (HR=2.77, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.12, p=0.0117) and high NLR values (HR=2.52, 95% CI 1.11 to 5.73, p=0.0271), as independent prognostic variables of worse outcome.

conclusionsThis is the first study, to our knowledge, to show a significant correlation between high NLR and worse prognosis in Caucasian patients with early breast cancer by means of propensity score-matched analysis. Further well designed prospective trials with a large sample size are needed to verify our findings and to justify introducing NLR assessment in clinical practice for prediction of cancer recurrence.

Indexed as

early breast cancerneutrophil to lymphocyte ratioprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27843594
PMCPMC5070254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.