Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27843591›Full record

ArticleESMO open2016

Descriptive statistical analysis of a real life cohort of 2419 patients with brain metastases of solid cancers.

Anna S Berghoff, Sophie Schur, Lisa M Füreder, Brigitte Gatterbauer, Karin Dieckmann, Georg Widhalm, Johannes Hainfellner, Christoph C Zielinski, Peter Birner, Rupert Bartsch and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Survival Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery inBrain tumor research and treatment · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cells · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Metabolic adaptations of brain metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna S BerghoffDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie SchurDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lisa M FürederDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte GatterbauerComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin DieckmannComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg WidhalmComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes HainfellnerComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph C ZielinskiDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter BirnerComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BartschDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PreusserDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe provide a descriptive statistical analysis of baseline characteristics and the clinical course of a large real-life cohort of brain metastases (BM) patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review for patients treated for BM of solid cancers at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2011.

resultsWe identified a total of 2419 BM patients (50.5% male, 49.5% female, median age 59 years). The primary tumour was lung cancer in 43.2%, breast cancer in 15.7%, melanoma in 16.4%, renal cell carcinoma in 9.1%, colorectal cancer in 9.3% and unknown in 1.4% of cases. Rare tumour types associated with BM included genitourinary cancers (4.1%), sarcomas (0.7%). gastro-oesophageal cancer (0.6%) and head and neck cancers (0.2%). 48.7% of patients presented with a singular BM, 27.7% with 2-3 and 23.5% with >3 BM. Time from primary tumour to BM diagnosis was shortest in lung cancer (median 11 months; range 1-162) and longest in breast cancer (median 44 months; 1-443; p<0.001). Multiple BM were most frequent in breast cancer (30.6%) and least frequent in colorectal cancer (8.5%; p<0.001). Patients with breast cancer had the longest median overall survival times (8 months), followed by patients with lung cancer (7 months), renal cell carcinoma (7 months), melanoma (5 months) and colorectal cancer (4 months; p<0.001; log rank test). Recursive partitioning analysis and graded prognostic assessment scores showed significant correlation with overall survival (both p<0.001, log rank test). Evaluation of the disease status in the past 2 months prior to patient death showed intracranial progression in 35.9%, extracranial progression in 27.5% and combined extracranial and intracranial progression in 36.6% of patients.

conclusionsOur data highlight the heterogeneity in presentation and clinical course of BM patients in the everyday clinical setting and may be useful for rational planning of clinical studies.

Indexed as

brain metastasesdescriptive analysisdisease status in end of life periodprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27843591
PMCPMC5070252
OpenAlexW2330914954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.