Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27842514›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2016

Thoracic perfusion of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) combined with chemotherapeutic agents versus chemotherapeutic agents alone for treating malignant pleural effusions: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.

Rong Biaoxue, Cai Xiguang, Liu Hua, Gao Wenlong, Yang Shuanying

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Malignant pleural disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rong BiaoxueDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Medical University, 48 Fenghao West Road, Xi'an, 710077, China. research568rbx@yeah.net.
Cai XiguangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Liu HuaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Gao WenlongDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yang ShuanyingDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Gansu Provincial Hospital · CNLanzhou University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndostar is a new endogenous angiogenic inhibitor with implicated anti-tumor activity. This study was to investigate whether thoracic perfusion of Endostar could be used to control malignant pleural effusions (MPE).

methodsWe searched the databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Goggle, Cochrance Library and CNKI to select the studies regarding the efficacy of Endostar to treat MPE. A total of 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 1066 patients were included.

resultsThe overall response rate (ORR) (P < 0.001; odds ratio = 3.58) and disease control rate (DCR) (P < 0.001; odds ratio = 2.97) of Endostar combined with chemotherapeutic agents were significantly higher than those of chemotherapeutic agents alone. In addition, Endostar combined treatment remarkably promoted quality of life (QOL) of patients (P < 0.001; odds ratio = 3.04) compared with that of chemotherapeutic agents alone. Moreover, Endostar combined treatment did not have an impact on the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe efficacy of Endostar combined chemotherapeutic agents was superior to chemotherapeutic agents alone through thoracic perfusion in treating MPE, which indicated that Endostar could be an effective agent for controlling MPE.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionEndostatinsHumansOdds RatioPleural Effusion, MalignantPublication BiasQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsEndostatinsRecombinant ProteinsEfficacyEndostarMalignant pleural effusionsMeta-analysisMPESafety

Identifiers

PMID27842514
PMCPMC5109813
OpenAlexW2552893456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.