ArticleBMC cancer2016
The validity of pediatric cancer diagnoses in a population-based general cancer registry in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary toxicity in children, adolescents, and young adults with testicular germ cell tumors: A population-based retrospective matched cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Physical morbidities in survivors of testicular germ cell tumors during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood: a population-based retrospective matched cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Improving Discrete Documentation of Cancer Staging-An Alert-Free Approach.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of weather and environmental factors and their association with cutaneous melanoma incidence: A national ecological study.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Temporal clustering of neuroblastic tumours in children and young adults from Ontario, Canada.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022Article
- Population-Based Study Detailing Cutaneous Melanoma Incidence and Mortality Trends in Canada.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- A Population-Based Study of COVID-19 Infection Among Childhood Cancer Survivors.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Assessment of Secondary Sarcomas Among Patients With Cancer of the Abdomen or Pelvis Who Received Combinations of Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy vs Surgery Alone.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Epidemiologic trends and geographic distribution of esophageal cancer in Canada: A national population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Use case driven evaluation of open databases for pediatric cancer research.BioData mining · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData from population-based cancer registries are increasingly used to conduct research and guide policy. However, few validation studies of cancer registry data have been conducted, particularly among children. We therefore aimed to determine the validity of pediatric diagnostic data in the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR).
methodsAll children diagnosed with any malignancy between 2000-2011 in Ontario, Canada were identified through the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System (POGONIS), a pediatric cancer registry actively maintained by trained data managers, and linked to the OCR. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes for each patient were taken from the OCR and converted to International Classification of Childhood Cancer (ICCC-3) diagnostic groups and subgroups using published algorithms. OCR-based ICCC-3 groupings were then validated by comparing them to gold standard diagnostic information from POGONIS.
resultsA total of 4448 patients met inclusion criteria; 4073 (91.6 %) were successfully linked to the OCR. Diagnostic accuracy was excellent for many childhood solid tumors. For example, the OCR correctly identified all cases of retinoblastoma [kappa = 1.00, 95
conclusionsMisclassification of common pediatric hematologic and CNS cancers was significant and may lead to inaccurate incidence and survival estimates using cancer registry data. Validation studies of pediatric data in other registries are necessary to identify practices and procedures leading to the highest quality information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.