Trial reportBMC family practice2016
Effectiveness of the EMPOWER-PAR Intervention in Improving Clinical Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01545401 (Empowering Primary Care Providers and Patients to Improve Chronic Disease Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Empowering Primary Care Providers and Patients to Improve Chronic Disease Outcomes: The EMPOWER Participatory Action Research (EMPOWER - PAR)
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation strategies for evidence-based management of type 2 diabetes at primary healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries and related barriers and facilitators: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Empowerment interventions designed for persons living with chronic disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis of the components and efficacy of format on patient-reported outcomes.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of the chronic care model for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes and Hypertension in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Task-sharing interventions for improving control of diabetes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Pooled it
- Health system interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2020Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Patient-Centred Medical Home-Based Models of Care versus Standard Primary Care in Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of Community-based Interventions in Reducing HbA1c Levels Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Recent Studies Conducted in Developing Countries.Journal of primary care & community healthPooled it
- The effectiveness of a value-based EMOtion-cognition-Focused educatIonal programme to reduce diabetes-related distress in Malay adults with Type 2 diabetes (VEMOFIT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC endocrine disorders · 2017Trial
- Self-management education and support for type 2 diabetes in Thailand: a cluster randomized trial (2019-2021).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- A realist review to understand the complexity of effective management of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Primary health care interventions targeting diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidemia in Malaysia: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Potential Biomarkers of Carbohydrate Metabolism Disorders: A Pilot Study.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Multilevel obstacles to heart-healthy living in the context of Ischemic heart disease: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Factors associated with usability of the EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Global Cardiovascular Risks Self-Management Booklet© among individuals with metabolic syndrome in primary care: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review.BMC primary care · 2024Review
- Community-based intervention for managing hypertension and diabetes in rural Bangladesh.Tropical medicine and health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe chronic care model was proven effective in improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in developed countries. However, evidence in developing countries is scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER-PAR intervention (based on the chronic care model) in improving clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus using readily available resources in the Malaysian public primary care setting.
methodsThis was a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, parallel, matched pair, controlled trial using participatory action research approach, conducted in 10 public primary care clinics in Malaysia. Five clinics were randomly selected to provide the EMPOWER-PAR intervention for 1 year and another five clinics continued with usual care. Patients who fulfilled the criteria were recruited over a 2-week period by each clinic. The obligatory intervention components were designed based on four elements of the chronic care model i.e. healthcare organisation, delivery system design, self-management support and decision support. The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 6.5%. Secondary outcomes were the change in proportion of patients achieving targets for blood pressure, lipid profile, body mass index and waist circumference. Intention to treat analysis was performed for all outcome measures. A generalised estimating equation method was used to account for baseline differences and clustering effect.
resultsA total of 888 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were recruited at baseline (intervention: 471 vs. CONTROL: 417). At 1-year, 96.6 and 97.8% of patients in the intervention and control groups completed the study, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable. The change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c target was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (intervention: 3.0% vs. CONTROL: -4.1%, P < 0.002). Patients who received the EMPOWER-PAR intervention were twice more likely to achieve HbA1c target compared to those in the control group (adjusted OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.50, P < 0.002). However, there was no significant improvement found in the secondary outcomes.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the EMPOWER-PAR intervention was effective in improving the primary outcome for type 2 diabetes in the Malaysian public primary care setting.
trial registrationRegistered with: ClinicalTrials.gov.: NCT01545401 . Date of registration: 1st March 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.