Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841863›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

Tumors overexpressing RNF168 show altered DNA repair and responses to genotoxic treatments, genomic instability and resistance to proteotoxic stress.

K Chroma, M Mistrik, P Moudry, J Gursky, M Liptay, R Strauss, Z Skrott, R Vrtel, J Bartkova, J Kramara and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ubiquitination Links DNA Damage and Repair Signaling to Cancer Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Emerging Roles of RNF168 in Tumor Progression.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

K ChromaInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
M MistrikInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
P MoudryInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
J GurskyInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
M LiptayInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
R StraussGenome Integrity Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Z SkrottInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
R VrtelDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
J BartkovaGenome Integrity Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J KramaraInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
J BartekInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Palacký University Olomouc · CZInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine · CZDanish Cancer Society · DKScience for Life Laboratory · SEUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin DNA damage response (DDR) is orchestrated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 168 (RNF168), resulting in ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of DDR factors and tumor suppressors breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1). This ubiquitin signaling regulates pathway choice for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), toxic lesions whose frequency increases during tumorigenesis. Recruitment of 53BP1 curbs DNA end resection, thereby limiting homologous recombination (HR) and directing DSB repair toward error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Under cancer-associated ubiquitin starvation conditions reflecting endogenous or treatment-evoked proteotoxic stress, the ubiquitin-dependent accrual of 53BP1 and BRCA1 at the DNA damage sites is attenuated or lost. Challenging this current paradigm, here we identified diverse human cancer cell lines that display 53BP1 recruitment to DSB sites even under proteasome inhibitor-induced proteotoxic stress, that is, under substantial depletion of free ubiquitin. We show that central to this unexpected phenotype is overabundance of RNF168 that enables more efficient exploitation of the residual-free ubiquitin. Cells with elevated RNF168 are more resistant to combined treatment by ionizing radiation and proteasome inhibition, suggesting that such aberrant RNF168-mediated signaling might reflect adaptation to chronic proteotoxic and genotoxic stresses experienced by tumor cells. Moreover, the overabundant RNF168 and the ensuing unorthodox recruitment patterns of 53BP1, RIF1 and REV7 (monitored on laser micro-irradiation-induced DNA damage) shift the DSB repair balance from HR toward NHEJ, a scenario accompanied by enhanced chromosomal instability/micronuclei formation and sensitivity under replication stress-inducing treatments with camptothecin or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. Overall, our data suggest that the deregulated RNF168/53BP1 pathway could promote tumorigenesis by selecting for a more robust, better stress-adapted cancer cell phenotype, through altered DNA repair, fueling genomic instability and tumor heterogeneity. Apart from providing insights into cancer (patho)biology, the elevated RNF168, documented here also by immunohistochemistry on human clinical tumor specimens, may impact responses to standard-of-care and some emerging targeted cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomic InstabilityAmino Acid MotifsCarcinogenesisCell Line, TumorDNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairHomeostasisHumansMutagensMutationPhenotypeProtein TransportSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1MutagensRNF168 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1UbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID27841863
OpenAlexW2554375055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.