Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841823›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)2017

A simple echocardiographic score for the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular disease in heart failure.

Michele D'Alto, Emanuele Romeo, Paola Argiento, Adriana Pavelescu, Antonello D'Andrea, Giovanni M Di Marco, Agostino Mattera Iacono, Berardo Sarubbi, Gaetano Rea, Eduardo Bossone and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele D'AltoaDepartment of Cardiology, Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy bDepartment of Cardiology, Moliére-Longchamp Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium cDepartment of Radiology, Monaldi Hospital, Naples dDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 'San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona' University Hospital, Salerno, Italy eDepartment of Cardiology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Emanuele Romeo
Paola Argiento
Adriana Pavelescu
Antonello D'Andrea
Giovanni M Di Marco
Agostino Mattera Iacono
Berardo Sarubbi
Gaetano Rea
Eduardo Bossone
Maria G Russo
Robert Naeije
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITErasmus Hospital · BEOspedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA simple echocardiographic score was designed for diagnosing precapillary vs postcapillary pulmonary hypertension and for discriminating between isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (Ipc-PH) and combined precapillary and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (Cpc-PH).

methodsThe score comprised 7 points (2 for E/e' ratio ≤10, 2 for a dilated non-collapsible inferior vena cava, 1 for a left ventricular eccentricity index ≥1.2, 1 for a right-to-left heart chamber dimension ratio >1 and 1 for the right ventricle forming the heart apex) and was applied to 230 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of pulmonary hypertension.

resultsPrecapillary pulmonary hypertension and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension were diagnosed in 160 and 70 patients, respectively. In the latter, Ipc-PH was found in 51 and Cpc-PH in 19. The echo score was higher in precapillary vs postcapillary pulmonary hypertension patients (4.2 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) and in patients with Cpc-PH vs Ipc-PH (2.7 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 1.3, P = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the echo score at least 2 for precapillary pulmonary hypertension were 99 and 54%, respectively (area under the curve 0.85). In patients with postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, the sensitivity and specificity of the echo score at least 2 for Cpc-PH were 63 and 82% (area under the curve 0.73).

conclusionA simple echocardiographic score helps in the differential diagnosis between precapillary and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, and between Ipc-PH and Cpc-PH.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerAdultAgedArea Under CurveCardiac CatheterizationDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHeart FailureHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesPulmonary ArteryPulmonary Wedge Pressure

Identifiers

PMID27841823
OpenAlexW2549249211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.