Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841775›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2017

An update on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic idiopathic neutropenia.

David C Dale, Audrey A Bolyard

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feline leukemia virus-negative acute lymphoid B-cell aleukemic leukemia in a cat with prolonged survival.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making for the neutropenic patient.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C DaleaDepartment of Medicine bDepartment of Medicine, Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Audrey A Bolyard
University of Washington · US

Funding

Severe Chronic Neutropenia International RegistryR24AI049393 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DALE, DAVID CHANDLER · 2004 to 2019
$10.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI049393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNeutropenia lasting for at least for 3 months and not attributable to drugs or a specific genetic, infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune or malignant cause is called chronic idiopathic neutropenia (CIN). CIN and autoimmune neutropenia (AIN) are very similar and overlapping conditions. The clinical consequences depend upon the severity of neutropenia, but it is not considered a premalignant condition. RECENT

findingsLong-term observational studies in children indicate that the disease often lasts for 3-5 years in children, then spontaneously remits, but it rarely remits in adult cases. The value of antineutrophil antibody testing in both children and adults is uncertain. Most recent data suggest that CIN and AIN are immune-mediated diseases, but there are no new clinical or genetic tests to aid in diagnosis. Treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is effective to increase blood neutrophils in almost all cases; this treatment is reserved, however, for patients with both neutropenia and evidence of recurrent fevers, inflammatory symptoms and infections. There is little or no evidence to indicate that G-CSF treatment predisposes to myeloid malignancies in this population. SUMMARY: It is important to recognize CIN and AIN, the most common causes of chronic neutropenia in both children and adults. If the neutropenia is not severe, that is more than 0.5 × 10/l, most patients can be observed and not treated prophylactically with antibiotics or a growth factor. When neutropenia is severe, treatment with G-CSF is often beneficial.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGenetic TestingGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLeukocyte CountNeutropeniaPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID27841775
PMCPMC5380401
OpenAlexW2552677859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.